Juan Contreras Corpus v. William Barr
| Juan Antonio Contreras Corpus |
| William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States |
| 20-1202 |
| June 11, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1847367] to motion to stay case [ # 1847001-2 ] combined with a MOTION to transfer case filed by William P. Barr [Service Date: 06/16/2020 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 365 words. [20-1202]--[Edited 06/16/2020 by AH--MODIFIED EVENT] (Lawrence, Victor) [Entered: 06/16/2020 10:48 AM] |
| LETTER [1847008] sent to warden sending Clerk order initial submissions for appellant/petitioner [ # 1847007-2 ], sending Clerk order of docketing fee payment [ # 1847006-3 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 07/13/2020. [20-1202] [Entered: 06/12/2020 12:38 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1847007] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 07/13/2020. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 07/13/2020. PETITIONER statement of issues due 07/13/2020. PETITIONER underlying decision due 07/13/2020. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 07/13/2020. PETITIONER procedural motions due 07/13/2020. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 07/27/2020; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 07/13/2020. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 07/13/2020. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 07/27/2020. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 07/27/2020, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to send this order to petitioner by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [20-1202] [Entered: 06/12/2020 12:36 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1847006] filed directing petitioner to pay the docketing fee or file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in this court by 07/13/2020. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to send this order to petitioner by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [20-1202] [Entered: 06/12/2020 12:34 PM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1847005] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1847001-2 ] [20-1202] [Entered: 06/12/2020 12:32 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1847001] of a decision by federal agency and MOTION to stay filed by Juan Antonio Contreras Corpus [Service Date: 06/12/2020 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Applicable to this Party; Certificate of Parties: Not Applicable to this Filing. [20-1202] [Entered: 06/12/2020 12:27 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [20-1202] [Entered: 06/12/2020 12:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Juan Contreras Corpus v. William Barr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Juan Antonio Contreras Corpus | |
| Represented By: | Warden (Lumpkin) |
| Represented By: | Juan Antonio Contreras Corpus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
