New York Stock Exchange LLC, et al v. SEC
| New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., NYSE American LLC, NYSE Chicago, Inc. and NYSE National, Inc. |
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| 20-1242 |
| July 10, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 New York Stock Exchange LLC v. Securities and Exchange Commission
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1851527] filed by Martin Totaro and co-counsel Tracey Hardin on behalf of Respondent SEC in 20-1242, 20-1243, 20-1244. [20-1242, 20-1243, 20-1244] (Totaro, Martin) [Entered: 07/14/2020 11:00 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1851421] filed consolidating cases 20-1243, 20-1244 (Consolidation started 07/13/2020) with 20-1242; directing party to file in 20-1242, 20-1243 initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 08/12/2020. PETITIONER statement of issues due 08/12/2020 [20-1242, 20-1243, 20-1244] [Entered: 07/13/2020 03:49 PM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1851399] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1851394-2 ] [20-1242] [Entered: 07/13/2020 03:02 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1851394] of a decision by federal agency filed by NYSE American LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., NYSE Chicago, Inc., NYSE National, Inc. and New York Stock Exchange LLC [Service Date: 07/10/2020 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached; Certificate of Parties: Not Applicable to this Filing. [20-1242] [Entered: 07/13/2020 03:00 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [20-1242] [Entered: 07/13/2020 02:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
