City of Seattle, Washington, et al v. FCC, et al
| City of Concord, California, City of Napa, California, City of Richmond, California, City of Beaverton, Oregon, City of Coronado, California, City of Pleasanton, California, City of Carlsbad, California, City of Seattle, Washington, Colorado Communications and Utility Alliance, City of Encinitas, California, City of Tumwater, Washington, City of Cerritos, California, City of Santa Cruz, California, City of San Ramon, California, Town of Danville, California, City of Solana Beach, California, City of Hermiston, Oregon, City of South Lake Tahoe, California and City of San Marcos, California |
| United States of America and Federal Communications Commission |
| 20-1300 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1856199] filed by Richard K. Welch and co-counsel Jacob M. Lewis on behalf of Respondent FCC in 20-1300, 20-1301. [20-1300, 20-1301] (Welch, Richard) [Entered: 08/12/2020 10:48 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1856100] filed consolidating case 20-1301 (Consolidation started 08/11/2020) with 20-1300; directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statements due 09/10/2020. PETITIONER certificates as to parties due 09/10/2020. PETITIONER statements of issues due 09/10/2020. JOINT PETITIONER underlying decision due 09/10/2020. JOINT PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 09/10/2020. PETITIONER procedural motions due 09/10/2020. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 09/25/2020; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 09/10/2020. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 09/10/2020. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 09/25/2020. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 09/25/2020 [20-1300, 20-1301] [Entered: 08/11/2020 03:23 PM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1856095] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1856092-2 ] [20-1300] [Entered: 08/11/2020 03:11 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1856092] of a decision by federal agency filed by City of Beaverton, Oregon, City of Carlsbad, California, City of Cerritos, California, City of Concord, California, City of Coronado, California, City of Encinitas, California, City of Hermiston, Oregon, City of Napa, California, City of Pleasanton, California, City of Richmond, California, City of San Marcos, California, City of San Ramon, California, City of Santa Cruz, California, City of Seattle, Washington, City of Solana Beach, California, City of South Lake Tahoe, California, City of Tumwater, Washington, Colorado Communications and Utility Alliance and Town of Danville, California [Service Date: 08/07/2020 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Applicable to this Party; Certificate of Parties: Not Applicable to this Filing. [20-1300] [Entered: 08/11/2020 03:09 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [20-1300] [Entered: 08/11/2020 03:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
