State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
State of New Jersey, State of Illinois, State of Colorado, by and through Attorney General Philip J. Weiser and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, State of North Carolina, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Washington, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of California, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra, and the California Air Resources Board, State of Oregon, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut, State of New York, State of Delaware, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Maine, State of Minnesota, District of Columbia, State of Michigan, City of Chicago, City and County of Denver, Commonwealth of Virginia and State of New Mexico |
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency |
20-1357 |
September 14, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1861492] filed by Adam Kron on behalf of Petitioner Environmental Integrity Project in 20-1359. [20-1359, 20-1357] (Kron, Adam) [Entered: 09/15/2020 11:41 AM] |
MOTION [1861564] to stay underlying order in case, for summary reversal (Response to Motion served by mail due on 09/25/2020) filed by Center for Biological Diversity, Clean Air Council, Earthworks, Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental Integrity Project, Food & Water Watch, Ft. Berthold Protectors of Water and Earth Rights, National Parks Conservation Association, Natural Resources Defense Council and Sierra Club in 20-1359 (Service Date: 09/15/2020 by CM/ECF NDA, Email) Length Certification: 7,749 words. [20-1359, 20-1357] (Weaver, Susannah) [Entered: 09/15/2020 05:08 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1861366] filed consolidating cases 20-1359 (Consolidation started 09/14/2020) with 20-1357; directing party to file in 20-1359 initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 10/14/2020. PETITIONER statement of issues due 10/14/2020 [20-1357, 20-1359] [Entered: 09/14/2020 05:33 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1861326] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 10/14/2020. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 10/14/2020. PETITIONER statement of issues due 10/14/2020. PETITIONER underlying decision due 10/14/2020. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 10/14/2020. PETITIONER procedural motions due 10/14/2020. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 10/29/2020; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 10/14/2020. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 10/14/2020. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 10/29/2020. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 10/29/2020 [20-1357] [Entered: 09/14/2020 03:14 PM] |
PETITION FOR REVIEW [1861323] of a decision by federal agency filed by City and County of Denver, City of Chicago, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of Virginia, DC, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Illinois, State of Maine, State of Maryland, State of Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of New Jersey, State of New Mexico, State of New York, State of North Carolina, State of Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont and State of Washington [Service Date: 09/14/2020 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Applicable to this Party; Certificate of Parties: Not Applicable to this Filing. [20-1357] [Entered: 09/14/2020 03:08 PM] |
CERTIFIED COPY [1861325] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1861323-2 ] [20-1357] [Entered: 09/14/2020 03:09 PM] |
PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [20-1357] [Entered: 09/14/2020 03:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.