Fontaine Lavot Riley v. William Barr
| Fontaine Lavot Riley |
| William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States |
| 20-1371 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1862549] filed by Christina P. Greer on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr. [20-1371] (Greer, Christina) [Entered: 09/21/2020 02:12 PM] |
| LETTER [1862217] sent to warden sending Clerk orders [ # 1862206-2 ], [ # 1862212-6 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 10/19/2020. [20-1371] [Entered: 09/18/2020 09:28 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1862212] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 10/19/2020. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 10/19/2020. PETITIONER statement of issues due 10/19/2020. PETITIONER underlying decision due 10/19/2020. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 10/19/2020. PETITIONER procedural motions due 10/19/2020. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 11/02/2020; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 10/19/2020. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 10/19/2020. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 11/02/2020. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 11/02/2020. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to petitioner by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [20-1371] [Entered: 09/18/2020 09:15 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1862206] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis PETITIONER motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court due 10/19/2020; directing party to file payment of docketing fee PETITIONER payment of docketing fee due 10/19/2020. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to petitioner by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [20-1371] [Entered: 09/18/2020 09:08 AM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1862201] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1862197-2 ] [20-1371] [Entered: 09/18/2020 08:46 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1862197] of a decision by federal agency and MOTION to stay filed by Fontaine Lavot Riley [Service Date: 09/18/2020 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Applicable to this Party; Certificate of Parties: Not Applicable to this Filing. [20-1371] [Entered: 09/18/2020 08:43 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [20-1371] [Entered: 09/18/2020 08:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Fontaine Lavot Riley v. William Barr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Fontaine Lavot Riley | |
| Represented By: | Fontaine Lavot Riley |
| Represented By: | Warden (Lumpkin) |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States | |
| Represented By: | Christina P. Greer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
