Knight First Amendment Inst., et al v. CIA, et al
| United States Department of State, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, United States Department of Justice, Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency |
| Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University |
| Committee to Protect Journalists |
| 20-5045 |
| March 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University v. Central Intelligence Agency
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1837252] submitted by Committee to Protect Journalists [Service Date: 04/08/2020 ] [20-5045] (Swain, Alexandra) [Entered: 04/08/2020 11:36 AM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1837249] filed by Committee to Protect Journalists [Service Date: 04/08/2020 ] [20-5045] (Swain, Alexandra) [Entered: 04/08/2020 11:33 AM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1837255] filed by Committee to Protect Journalists [Service Date: 04/08/2020 ] [20-5045] (Swain, Alexandra) [Entered: 04/08/2020 11:38 AM] |
| STATEMENT [1837257] with Disclosure Listing filed by Committee to Protect Journalists [Service Date: 04/08/2020 ] [20-5045] (Swain, Alexandra) [Entered: 04/08/2020 11:49 AM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1837371] filed by CIA, DOJ, National Security Agency and Office of the Director of National Intelligence [Service Date: 04/08/2020 ] [20-5045] (Carson, Sonia) [Entered: 04/08/2020 07:47 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1837246] filed by Committee to Protect Journalists [Service Date: 04/08/2020 ] [20-5045] (Swain, Alexandra) [Entered: 04/08/2020 11:32 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1837240] filed by Alexandra P. Swain and co-counsel Jeremy Feigelson; Timothy K. Beeken on behalf of Appellant Committee to Protect Journalists. [20-5045] (Swain, Alexandra) [Entered: 04/08/2020 11:14 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1833996] filed by Sonia M. Carson and co-counsel H. Thomas Byron III on behalf of Appellees CIA, DOJ, DOS, National Security Agency and Office of the Director of National Intelligence. [20-5045] (Carson, Sonia) [Entered: 03/17/2020 10:19 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1833935] filed by Committee to Protect Journalists [Service Date: 03/17/2020 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [20-5045] (Beeken, Timothy) [Entered: 03/17/2020 03:28 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1832485] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:18-cv-02709-TNM filed by Committee To Protect Journalists. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-5045. [20-5045] [Entered: 03/09/2020 12:58 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1832487] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 04/08/2020. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 04/08/2020. APPELLANT statement of issues due 04/08/2020. APPELLANT underlying decision due 04/08/2020. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 04/08/2020. APPELLANT notice of appearance due 04/08/2020. APPELLANT transcript status report due 04/08/2020. APPELLANT procedural motions due 04/08/2020. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 04/23/2020; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 04/08/2020. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 04/08/2020. APPELLEE procedural motions due 04/08/2020. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 04/23/2020 [20-5045] [Entered: 03/09/2020 12:59 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [20-5045] [Entered: 03/09/2020 12:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
