Cato Institute v. SEC, et al
| Cato Institute |
| Securities and Exchange Commission, Vanessa Ann Countryman, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Jay Clayton, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
| 20-5054 |
| March 16, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Cato Institute v. Securities and Exchange Commission
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1842112] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 06/22/2020. APPENDIX due 06/22/2020. APPELLEE Brief due on 07/22/2020. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 08/12/2020 [20-5054] [Entered: 05/11/2020 11:38 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1837598] filed by Jeffrey A. Berger and co-counsel Michael A. Conley on behalf of Appellees Jay Clayton, Vanessa Ann Countryman and SEC. [20-5054] (Berger, Jeffrey) [Entered: 04/10/2020 09:59 AM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1836963] filed by Cato Institute [Service Date: 04/06/2020 ] [20-5054] (McNamara, Robert) [Entered: 04/06/2020 05:46 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1836964] filed by Cato Institute [Service Date: 04/06/2020 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [20-5054] (McNamara, Robert) [Entered: 04/06/2020 05:48 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1836966] submitted by Cato Institute [Service Date: 04/06/2020 ] [20-5054] (McNamara, Robert) [Entered: 04/06/2020 05:51 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1836962] filed by Cato Institute [Service Date: 04/06/2020 ] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [20-5054] (McNamara, Robert) [Entered: 04/06/2020 05:45 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT AND 26.1 STATEMENT [1836961] filed by Cato Institute [Service Date: 04/06/2020 ] [20-5054]--[Edited 04/07/2020 by LMF] (McNamara, Robert) [Entered: 04/06/2020 05:41 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1836958] filed by Cato Institute [Service Date: 04/06/2020 ] [20-5054] (McNamara, Robert) [Entered: 04/06/2020 05:37 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1836955] filed by Robert J. McNamara and co-counsel Jaimie N. Cavanaugh on behalf of Appellant Cato Institute. [20-5054] (McNamara, Robert) [Entered: 04/06/2020 05:34 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1833662] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-00047-ABJ filed by Cato Institute. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-5054. [20-5054] [Entered: 03/16/2020 01:37 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1833666] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 04/15/2020. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 04/15/2020. APPELLANT statement of issues due 04/15/2020. APPELLANT underlying decision due 04/15/2020. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 04/15/2020. APPELLANT notice of appearance due 04/15/2020. APPELLANT transcript status report due 04/15/2020. APPELLANT procedural motions due 04/15/2020. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 04/30/2020; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 04/15/2020. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 04/15/2020. APPELLEE procedural motions due 04/15/2020. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 04/30/2020 [20-5054] [Entered: 03/16/2020 01:39 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [20-5054] [Entered: 03/16/2020 01:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cato Institute v. SEC, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Cato Institute | |
| Represented By: | Paul Michael Sherman |
| Represented By: | Robert James McNamara |
| Represented By: | Jaimie N. Cavanaugh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Securities and Exchange Commission | |
| Represented By: | Melinda Hardy |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Alan Berger |
| Represented By: | Michael Andrew Conley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Vanessa Ann Countryman, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission | |
| Represented By: | Melinda Hardy |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Alan Berger |
| Represented By: | Michael Andrew Conley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Jay Clayton, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission | |
| Represented By: | Melinda Hardy |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Alan Berger |
| Represented By: | Michael Andrew Conley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
