Ronald Keats, et al v. Alex M. Azar
| Kathleen Sebelius and Alex Michael Azar, II |
| Kathleen Keats and Ronald Keats |
| 20-5069 |
| March 26, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1841190] filed granting motion to extend time [ # 1840982-2 ]; extending Clerk order initial submissions [ # 1835501-2 ] APPELLANT and APPELLEE dispositive motions, if any, due 06/10/2020 [20-5069] [Entered: 05/04/2020 03:40 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION [1840982] to extend time to file motion to 06/10/2020 filed by Mr. Alex Michael Azar, II [Service Date: 05/01/2020 ] Length Certification: 381 Words. [20-5069] (Lawrence, R.) [Entered: 05/01/2020 06:17 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1840596] submitted by Kathleen Keats and Ronald Keats [Service Date: 04/29/2020 ] [20-5069] (Klimaski, James) [Entered: 04/29/2020 07:37 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1840598] filed by Kathleen Keats and Ronald Keats [Service Date: 04/29/2020 ] [20-5069] (Klimaski, James) [Entered: 04/29/2020 08:12 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1840339] filed by Kathleen Keats and Ronald Keats [Service Date: 04/29/2020 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [20-5069]--[MODIFIED EVENT--Edited 04/29/2020 by LMC] (Klimaski, James) [Entered: 04/28/2020 09:00 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1840340] filed by JAMES R. KLIMASKI and co-counsel JOHN McCOY on behalf of Appellants Kathleen Keats and Ronald Keats. [20-5069] (Klimaski, James) [Entered: 04/28/2020 09:04 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1840336] filed by Kathleen Keats and Ronald Keats [Service Date: 04/28/2020 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [20-5069]--[MODIFIED EVENT--Edited 04/29/2020 by LMC] (Klimaski, James) [Entered: 04/28/2020 08:56 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1840335] filed by Kathleen Keats and Ronald Keats [Service Date: 04/28/2020 ] [20-5069] (Klimaski, James) [Entered: 04/28/2020 08:52 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1839934] filed by Brenda Gonzalez-Horowitz on behalf of Appellee Mr. Alex Michael Azar, II. [20-5069] (Lawrence, R.) [Entered: 04/27/2020 12:35 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1839941] filed by Mr. Alex Michael Azar, II [Service Date: 04/27/2020 ] [20-5069] (Lawrence, R.) [Entered: 04/27/2020 12:39 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1840071] filed by Ronald Keats and Kathleen Keats [Service Date: 04/27/2020 ] [20-5069] (Klimaski, James) [Entered: 04/27/2020 05:32 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1835499] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:13-cv-01524-TSC filed by Kathleen Keats and Ronald Keats. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-5069. [20-5069] [Entered: 03/26/2020 12:57 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1835501] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 04/27/2020. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 04/27/2020. APPELLANT statement of issues due 04/27/2020. APPELLANT underlying decision due 04/27/2020. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 04/27/2020. APPELLANT notice of appearance due 04/27/2020. APPELLANT transcript status report due 04/27/2020. APPELLANT procedural motions due 04/27/2020. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 05/11/2020; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 04/27/2020. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 04/27/2020. APPELLEE procedural motions due 04/27/2020. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 05/11/2020 [20-5069] [Entered: 03/26/2020 12:59 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [20-5069] [Entered: 03/26/2020 12:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
