Cause of Action Institute v. DOJ
| Cause of Action Institute |
| United States Department of Justice |
| 20-5182 |
| June 26, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Cause of Action Institute v. Department of Justice
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| OPINION [1900746] filed (Pages: 16) for the Court by Judge Edwards, CONCURRING OPINION (Pages: 3) by Judge Rao. [20-5182] [Entered: 06/01/2021 10:32 AM] |
| PER CURIAM JUDGMENT [1900744] filed that the judgment of the District Court denying the request for disclosure of the QFR documents be reversed; the DOJ be ordered to release the QFR documents at issue in full, subject only to any applicable statutory exemptions; and the portion of the appeal challenging the OIP Guidance be dismissed as unripe, for the reasons in the accompanying opinion . Before Judges: Rao, Walker and Edwards. [20-5182] [Entered: 06/01/2021 10:28 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1900747] filed withholding issuance of the mandate. [20-5182] [Entered: 06/01/2021 10:36 AM] |
| ORAL ARGUMENT HELD before Judges Rao, Walker and Edwards. [20-5182] [Entered: 03/09/2021 10:42 AM] |
| PER CURIAM ORDER [1886741] filed allocating oral argument time as follows: Appellant - 10 Minutes, Appellee - 10 Minutes. One counsel per side to argue; directing party to file Form 72 notice of arguing attorney by 03/01/2021 [20-5182] [Entered: 02/23/2021 03:12 PM] |
| FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Ryan P. Mulvey, on behalf of Appellant Cause of Action Institute (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information) . [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 02/23/2021 04:20 PM] |
| FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Casen B. Ross, on behalf of Appellee DOJ (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information) . [20-5182] (Ross, Casen) [Entered: 02/18/2021 10:15 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1882885] filed scheduling oral argument on Tuesday, 03/09/2021. [20-5182] [Entered: 01/29/2021 04:54 PM] |
| APPELLANT REPLY BRIEF [1880890] filed by Cause of Action Institute [Service Date: 01/21/2021 ] Length of Brief: 6,451 words. [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 01/21/2021 09:40 AM] |
| CORRECTED APPELLEE BRIEF [1878762] filed by DOJ [Service Date: 01/06/2021 ] Length of Brief: 8,010 Words. [20-5182] (Ross, Casen) [Entered: 01/06/2021 06:39 PM] |
| APPELLEE BRIEF [1877856] filed by DOJ [Service Date: 12/30/2020 ] Length of Brief: 8,010 Words. [20-5182] (Ross, Casen) [Entered: 12/30/2020 12:45 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1871658] filed granting appellee's unopposed motion to extend time [ # 1871243-2 ], The following revised briefing schedule will now apply: APPELLEE Brief due on 12/30/2021. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 01/21/2021 [20-5182] [Entered: 11/17/2020 03:27 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION [1871243] to extend time to file brief to 12/30/2020 filed by DOJ [Service Date: 11/16/2020 ] Length Certification: 254 Words. [20-5182] (Ross, Casen) [Entered: 11/16/2020 09:53 AM] |
| CORRECTED APPELLANT BRIEF [1869892] filed by Cause of Action Institute [Service Date: 11/05/2020 ] Length of Brief: 12,823 Words. [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 11/05/2020 01:54 PM] |
| LETTER [1869903] Response to Clerk's letter concerning uncommon acronyms and abbreviations in briefs filed by Cause of Action Institute [Service Date: 11/05/2020 ] [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 11/05/2020 02:17 PM] |
| LETTER [1869713] sent to counsel concerning the use of uncommon acronyms and abbreviations in briefs. Nonconforming Briefs: [ # 1869008-2 ]. [20-5182] [Entered: 11/04/2020 01:50 PM] |
| APPELLANT BRIEF [1869008] filed by Cause of Action Institute [Service Date: 10/30/2020 ] Length of Brief: 12,624 words. [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 10/30/2020 07:22 AM] |
| JOINT APPENDIX [1869007] filed by Cause of Action Institute. [Volumes: 1] [Service Date: 10/30/2020 ] [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 10/30/2020 07:17 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1859863] filed granting appellant's consent motion to extend time [ # 1859584-2 ], The following revised briefing schedule will now apply: APPELLANT Brief due 10/30/2020. APPENDIX due 10/30/2020. APPELLEE Brief due on 11/30/2020. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 12/21/2020 [20-5182] [Entered: 09/03/2020 05:10 PM] |
| CONSENT UNOPPOSED MOTION [1859584] to extend time to file brief to 10/30/2020 filed by Cause of Action Institute [Service Date: 09/02/2020 ] Length Certification: 448 words. [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 09/02/2020 02:57 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH TYPE-VOLUME LIMITS [1859590] for motion to extend time [ # 1859584-2 ] filed by Cause of Action Institute. [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 09/02/2020 03:16 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1857762] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 09/30/2020. APPENDIX due 09/30/2020. APPELLEE Brief due on 10/30/2020. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 11/20/2020 [20-5182] [Entered: 08/21/2020 03:54 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1852569] filed by DOJ [Service Date: 07/20/2020 ] [20-5182] (Ross, Casen) [Entered: 07/20/2020 04:39 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1851897] filed by Casen B. Ross and co-counsel Daniel Tenny on behalf of Appellee DOJ. [20-5182] (Ross, Casen) [Entered: 07/15/2020 04:58 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1851326] filed by Cause of Action Institute [Service Date: 07/13/2020 ] [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 07/13/2020 11:55 AM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1850295] filed by Cause of Action Institute [Service Date: 07/06/2020 ] [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 07/06/2020 02:49 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1850293] filed by Ryan P. Mulvey and co-counsel R. James Valvo, III on behalf of Appellant Cause of Action Institute. [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 07/06/2020 02:47 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1850303] filed by Cause of Action Institute [Service Date: 07/06/2020 ] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 07/06/2020 03:15 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1850297] filed by Cause of Action Institute [Service Date: 07/06/2020 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 07/06/2020 02:53 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1850304] submitted by Cause of Action Institute [Service Date: 07/06/2020 ] [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 07/06/2020 03:16 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1850338] filed by Cause of Action Institute [Service Date: 07/06/2020 ] [20-5182] (Mulvey, Ryan) [Entered: 07/06/2020 04:53 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1849146] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:18-cv-02373-ABJ filed by Cause of Action Institute. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-5182. [20-5182] [Entered: 06/26/2020 01:41 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1849148] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 07/27/2020. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 07/27/2020. APPELLANT statement of issues due 07/27/2020. APPELLANT underlying decision due 07/27/2020. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 07/27/2020. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 07/27/2020. APPELLANT transcript status report due 07/27/2020. APPELLANT procedural motions due 07/27/2020. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 08/10/2020; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 07/27/2020. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 07/27/2020. APPELLEE procedural motions due 07/27/2020. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 08/10/2020 [20-5182] [Entered: 06/26/2020 01:42 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [20-5182] [Entered: 06/26/2020 01:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
