Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. USA, et al
| Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey |
| Angela Caesar and United States of America |
| 20-5272 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECEIPT [1867003] received from illegible [signed for on 09/11/2020] for documents [ # 1859462-2 ] sent to Appellant Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey [20-5272] [Entered: 10/19/2020 12:13 PM] |
| RESPONSE [1864026] to order [ # 1859458-5 ] filed by Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey (Service Date: 09/16/2020 by US Mail) Length Certification: 10 pages. [20-5272] [Entered: 09/30/2020 07:24 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1859458] filed to show cause regarding payment of docketing fee. Response to Order due 10/01/2020. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [20-5272] [Entered: 09/01/2020 07:32 PM] |
| LETTER [1859462] sent to warden sending Clerk order of docketing fee payment [ # 1859458-2 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 10/01/2020. [20-5272] [Entered: 09/01/2020 07:46 PM] |
| US PRISONER CASE docketed. [20-5272] [Entered: 09/01/2020 07:20 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1859455] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-01868-UNA filed by Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-5272. [20-5272] [Entered: 09/01/2020 07:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
