Dale Adams v. Mitch McConnell
Dale B. Adams |
Mitch McConnell |
20-5359 |
December 4, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S ORDER [1874420] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 01/25/2021. APPENDIX due 01/25/2021. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [20-5359] [Entered: 12/04/2020 12:31 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1874417] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-03072-UNA filed by Mr. Dale B. Adams. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-5359. [20-5359] [Entered: 12/04/2020 12:24 PM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [20-5359] [Entered: 12/04/2020 12:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Dale Adams v. Mitch McConnell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Dale B. Adams | |
Represented By: | Dale B. Adams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Mitch McConnell | |
Represented By: | R. Craig Lawrence |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.