Garry Gallardo v. Donald Trump, et al
| Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Rosalind Sargent-Burns, Pardon Attorney and Jared Kushner, President's Advisor |
| Garry David Gallardo |
| 20-5366 |
| December 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE [1881871] to order [ # 1875008-5 ] filed by Garry David Gallardo (Service Date: 01/26/2021 by Clerk, CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 2 Pages. [20-5366] [Entered: 01/26/2021 01:32 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1879143] filed considering appellant's motion for extension of time to respond to the courts December 9, 2020 order [ # 1879117-2 ]. ORDERED that the following revised schedule will now apply in this case: APPELLANT'S payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court, consent to collection form, prisoner trust account report, and response to order to show cause [ # 1875008-2 ] are now due February 22, 2021. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [20-5366] [Entered: 01/08/2021 05:14 PM] |
| LETTER [1879144] sent to warden sending Clerk order [ # 1879143-4 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 02/08/2021. [20-5366] [Entered: 01/08/2021 05:15 PM] |
| RECEIPT [1879575] received from Gary Gallardo [signed for on 12/23/2020] for documents [ # 1875010-2 ] sent to Appellant Garry David Gallardo [20-5366] [Entered: 01/12/2021 11:15 AM] |
| MOTION [1879117] to extend time to file response filed by Garry David Gallardo (Service Date: 01/08/2021 by Clerk, CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 2 Pages. [20-5366] [Entered: 01/08/2021 03:28 PM] |
| NOTICE [1876824] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court to supplement record "FIAT order - Notice of Appeal" [20-5366] [Entered: 12/22/2020 01:33 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1874985] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-00325-UNA filed by Garry David Gallardo. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-5366. [20-5366] [Entered: 12/09/2020 10:31 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1874999] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 01/08/2021; directing party to file ifp prisoner submissions: APPELLANT prisoner trust account report due 01/08/2021. APPELLANT consent to collection form due 01/08/2021, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [20-5366] [Entered: 12/09/2020 11:02 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1875008] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 01/08/2021. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order., Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [20-5366] [Entered: 12/09/2020 11:30 AM] |
| LETTER [1875010] sent to warden sending Clerk order to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction [ # 1875008-2 ], sending Clerk order ifp motion or docket fee [ # 1874999-2 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 01/08/2021. [20-5366] [Entered: 12/09/2020 11:33 AM] |
| US PRISONER CASE docketed. [20-5366] [Entered: 12/09/2020 10:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
