Teresa Richardson, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
Plaintiff / Appellee: Christopher Carroll, Teresa Richardson, Aida Zargas and Gina Arfi
Defendant / Appellant: Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States Postal Service, Louis DeJoy, in his official capacity as Postmaster General of the United States and Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States
Case Number: 20-5367
Filed: December 9, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2021 NOTICE [1881884] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court to dismiss case voluntarily. [20-5367] [Entered: 01/26/2021 02:18 PM]
January 22, 2021 UNOPPOSED MOTION [1881362] to dismiss case voluntarily filed by Donald J. Trump, Louis DeJoy and USPS [Service Date: 01/22/2021 ] Length Certification: 77 words. [20-5367] (Neumeister, McKaye) [Entered: 01/22/2021 03:07 PM]
January 7, 2021 STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1878906] filed by Louis DeJoy, Donald J. Trump and USPS [Service Date: 01/07/2021 ] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [20-5367] (Neumeister, McKaye) [Entered: 01/07/2021 03:32 PM]
January 7, 2021 TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1878907] filed by Louis DeJoy, Donald J. Trump and USPS [Service Date: 01/07/2021 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - All transcripts needed for the appeal have been completed and received. [20-5367] (Neumeister, McKaye) [Entered: 01/07/2021 03:35 PM]
January 7, 2021 STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1878909] filed by Louis DeJoy, Donald J. Trump and USPS [Service Date: 01/07/2021 ] [20-5367] (Neumeister, McKaye) [Entered: 01/07/2021 03:38 PM]
January 7, 2021 DOCKETING STATEMENT [1878905] filed by Louis DeJoy, Donald J. Trump and USPS [Service Date: 01/07/2021 ] [20-5367] (Neumeister, McKaye) [Entered: 01/07/2021 03:31 PM]
January 7, 2021 UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1878908] submitted by Louis DeJoy, Donald J. Trump and USPS [Service Date: 01/07/2021 ] [20-5367] (Neumeister, McKaye) [Entered: 01/07/2021 03:37 PM]
January 7, 2021 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1878904] filed by Louis DeJoy, Donald J. Trump and USPS [Service Date: 01/07/2021 ] [20-5367] (Neumeister, McKaye) [Entered: 01/07/2021 03:29 PM]
January 4, 2021 CLERK'S ORDER [1878169] filed granting motion to extend time [ # 1878138-2 ]; extending Clerk order initial submissions for appellant/petitioner [ # 1875053-2 ] APPELLANT procedural motions due 01/19/2021; extending Clerk order initial submissions for appellee/respondent [ # 1875053-3 ] APPELLEE procedural motions due 01/19/2021 [20-5367] [Entered: 01/04/2021 09:10 AM]
December 31, 2020 UNOPPOSED MOTION [1878138] to extend time to file motion to 01/19/2021 filed by Louis DeJoy, USPS and Donald J. Trump [Service Date: 12/31/2020 ] Length Certification: 294 words. [20-5367] (Neumeister, McKaye) [Entered: 12/31/2020 06:35 PM]
December 16, 2020 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1876085] filed by McKaye L. Neumeister and co-counsel Adam C. Jed, Mark B. Stern on behalf of Appellants Donald J. Trump, USPS and Louis DeJoy. [20-5367] (Neumeister, McKaye) [Entered: 12/16/2020 07:48 PM]
December 9, 2020 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1875040] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-02262-EGS filed by Louis DeJoy, Donald J. Trump and USPS. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-5367. [20-5367] [Entered: 12/09/2020 01:12 PM]
December 9, 2020 CLERK'S ORDER [1875053] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 01/08/2021. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 01/08/2021. APPELLANT statement of issues due 01/08/2021. APPELLANT underlying decision due 01/08/2021. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 01/08/2021. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 01/08/2021. APPELLANT transcript status report due 01/08/2021. APPELLANT procedural motions due 01/08/2021. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 01/25/2021; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 01/08/2021. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 01/08/2021. APPELLEE procedural motions due 01/08/2021. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 01/25/2021 [20-5367] [Entered: 12/09/2020 01:29 PM]
December 9, 2020 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [20-5367] [Entered: 12/09/2020 12:55 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Teresa Richardson, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Christopher Carroll
Represented By: Joel Androphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Teresa Richardson
Represented By: Joel Androphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Aida Zargas
Represented By: Joel Androphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Gina Arfi
Represented By: Joel Androphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States
Represented By: DOJ Appellate Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: United States Postal Service
Represented By: DOJ Appellate Counsel
Represented By: McKaye Lea Neumeister
Represented By: Mark B. Stern
Represented By: Adam C. Jed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Louis DeJoy, in his official capacity as Postmaster General of the United States
Represented By: DOJ Appellate Counsel
Represented By: McKaye Lea Neumeister
Represented By: Mark B. Stern
Represented By: Adam C. Jed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States
Represented By: McKaye Lea Neumeister
Represented By: Mark B. Stern
Represented By: Adam C. Jed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?