Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan, et al
Daryl Sharp |
Charles Chaput, Archbishop of Archdiocese of Philadelphia, Jose Gomez, Archbishop of Archdiocese of Los Angeles, Daniel Dinardo, Archbishop and Cardinal of Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston, Christopher Pierre, Apostolic Nuncio, Timothy J. Dolan, Archbishop and Cardinal of Archdiocese of New York and United States Conference of Catholic Bishops |
20-7007 |
January 31, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPELLANT BRIEF [1834617] filed by Daryl Sharp [Service Date: 03/21/2020 ] Length of Brief: 6 Pages (Exhibits: 69 pages). [20-7007] [Entered: 03/21/2020 04:33 PM] |
CERTIFIED MAIL and FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1826772] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7017 3040 00041 1261 0485] of order [ # 1826771-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 03/04/2020 from Daryl Sharp. [20-7007] [Entered: 02/03/2020 02:42 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1826771] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 03/24/2020. APPENDIX due 03/24/2020. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [20-7007] [Entered: 02/03/2020 02:38 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1826767] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-03848-UNA filed by Daryl Sharp. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-7007. [20-7007] [Entered: 02/03/2020 02:32 PM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [20-7007] [Entered: 02/03/2020 02:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.