Robert Chipman v. Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc., et al
| Merkle Group Inc. Open Access Plus Medical Benefits Plan, Merkle Group Inc. and Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc. |
| Robert B. Chipman |
| 20-7094 |
| October 7, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| STATEMENT [1872703] with Disclosure Listing filed by Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc. [Service Date: 11/23/2020 ] [20-7094] (Humber, Christopher) [Entered: 11/23/2020 12:03 PM] |
| STATEMENT [1872704] with Disclosure Listing filed by Merkle Group Inc. and Merkle Group Inc. Open Access Plus Medical Benefits Plan [Service Date: 11/23/2020 ] [20-7094] (Humber, Christopher) [Entered: 11/23/2020 12:04 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1870841] filed by Christopher E. Humber on behalf of Appellees Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc., Merkle Group Inc. and Merkle Group Inc. Open Access Plus Medical Benefits Plan. [20-7094] (Humber, Christopher) [Entered: 11/12/2020 03:06 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1870843] filed by Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc., Merkle Group Inc. and Merkle Group Inc. Open Access Plus Medical Benefits Plan [Service Date: 11/12/2020 ] [20-7094] (Humber, Christopher) [Entered: 11/12/2020 03:10 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1870192] filed by Robert B. Chipman [Service Date: 11/08/2020 ] [20-7094] (Clark, Denise) [Entered: 11/08/2020 10:36 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1870193] submitted by Robert B. Chipman [Service Date: 11/08/2020 ] [20-7094] (Clark, Denise) [Entered: 11/08/2020 10:40 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1870191] filed by Robert B. Chipman [Service Date: 11/08/2020 ] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [20-7094] (Clark, Denise) [Entered: 11/08/2020 10:35 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1870190] filed by Robert B. Chipman [Service Date: 11/08/2020 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [20-7094] (Clark, Denise) [Entered: 11/08/2020 10:33 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1870186] filed by Robert B. Chipman [Service Date: 11/08/2020 ] [20-7094] (Clark, Denise) [Entered: 11/08/2020 10:17 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1870188] filed by Robert B. Chipman [Service Date: 11/08/2020 ] [20-7094] (Clark, Denise) [Entered: 11/08/2020 10:24 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1870187] filed by Denise Marie Clark on behalf of Appellant Robert B. Chipman. [20-7094] (Clark, Denise) [Entered: 11/08/2020 10:22 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1870189] submitted by Robert B. Chipman [Service Date: 11/08/2020 ] [20-7094] (Clark, Denise) [Entered: 11/08/2020 10:26 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1865281] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-00456-TJK filed by Robert B. Chipman. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-7094. [20-7094] [Entered: 10/07/2020 12:40 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1865296] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 11/06/2020. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 11/06/2020. APPELLANT statement of issues due 11/06/2020. APPELLANT underlying decision due 11/06/2020. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 11/06/2020. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 11/06/2020. APPELLANT transcript status report due 11/06/2020. APPELLANT procedural motions due 11/06/2020. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 11/23/2020. Directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 11/06/2020. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 11/06/2020. APPELLEE procedural motions due 11/06/2020. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 11/23/2020 [20-7094] [Entered: 10/07/2020 01:25 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [20-7094] [Entered: 10/07/2020 12:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
