Brud Rossmann v. Sergey Ivanov, et al
| John Doe, 2, John Doe N, Sergey Ivanov, Les Vermillion and John Doe, 1 |
| Brud Rossmann |
| 20-7100 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT BRIEF and APPENDIX [1874932] filed by Mr. Brud Rossmann [Service Date: 12/07/2020 ] Length of Brief: 8 pages. [20-7100] [Entered: 12/08/2020 05:15 PM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1868778] received from delivered to front desk per USPS [signed for on 10/24/2020] for order [1866876-2] sent to Appellant Mr. Brud Rossmann [20-7100] [Entered: 10/29/2020 10:03 AM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL and FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1866876] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7017 3040 0001 1261 1598] of order [ # 1866582-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 11/16/2020 from Brud Rossmann. [20-7100] [Entered: 10/16/2020 05:56 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1866582] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 12/07/2020. APPENDIX due 12/07/2020, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [20-7100] [Entered: 10/16/2020 07:23 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1866460] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-01883-UNA filed by Mr. Brud Rossmann. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 20-7100. [20-7100] [Entered: 10/15/2020 01:17 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [20-7100] [Entered: 10/15/2020 01:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
