Sierra Club, et al v. EPA, et al
| Natural Resources Defense Council, Clean Air Muscatine, Environmental Integrity Project and Sierra Club |
| Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
| 21-1022 |
| January 15, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1880389] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 02/16/2021. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 02/16/2021. PETITIONER statement of issues due 02/16/2021. PETITIONER underlying decision due 02/16/2021. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 02/16/2021. PETITIONER procedural motions due 02/16/2021. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 03/01/2021; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 02/16/2021. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 02/16/2021. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 03/01/2021. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 03/01/2021 [21-1022] [Entered: 01/15/2021 02:08 PM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1880388] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1880386-2 ] [21-1022] [Entered: 01/15/2021 02:05 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1880386] of a decision by federal agency filed by Clean Air Muscatine, Environmental Integrity Project, Natural Resources Defense Council and Sierra Club [Service Date: 01/15/2021 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [21-1022] [Entered: 01/15/2021 02:02 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [21-1022] [Entered: 01/15/2021 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
