National Family Farm Coalition, et al v. EPA, et al
| Center for Food Safety, Center for Biological Diversity, National Family Farm Coalition and Pesticide Action Network North America |
| Environmental Protection Agency, Jane Nishida, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator and Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator |
| BASF Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Bayer CropScience LP |
| 21-1043 |
| January 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE IN SUPPORT [1883843] to motion to hold case in abeyance [ # 1883645-2 ] filed by Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Food Safety, National Family Farm Coalition and Pesticide Action Network North America in 21-1043 [Service Date: 02/04/2021 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: This document complies with the type-volume limit of FRAP 27(d)(2) because, excluding the parts of the document exempted by FRAP 27(a)(2)(b) and 32, this document contains 637 words, as determined by the word-count function of Microsoft Word.. [21-1043, 20-1441, 20-1445, 20-1484] (Kimbrell, George) [Entered: 02/04/2021 07:42 PM] |
| RESPONSE IN SUPPORT [1883788] to motion [ # 1883192-2 ], motion [ # 1883193-2 ], motion [ # 1883201-2 ] filed by Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Food Safety, National Family Farm Coalition and Pesticide Action Network North America in 21-1043 [Service Date: 02/04/2021 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: This document complies with the type-volume limit of FRAP 27(d)(2) because, excluding the parts of the document exempted by FRAP 27(a)(2)(b) and 32, this document contains 359 words, as determined by the word-count function of Microsoft Word. [21-1043, 20-1441, 20-1445, 20-1484]--[Edited 02/05/2021 by SHA - Party Filers Modified by the Clerk's Office] (Parent, Stephanie) [Entered: 02/04/2021 03:23 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION [1883645] to hold case in abeyance filed by Jane Nishida, Marietta Echeverria and EPA in 20-1441, 20-1445, 20-1484, Jane Nishida and EPA in 21-1043 [Service Date: 02/03/2021 ] Length Certification: 637 words. [20-1441, 20-1445, 20-1484, 21-1043] (Knudsen, Andrew) [Entered: 02/03/2021 06:12 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1883240] filed consolidating cases 21-1043 (Consolidation started 02/02/2021) with 20-1441; directing party to file in 21-1043 initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 02/22/2021. PETITIONER statement of issues due 02/22/2021. The remaining deadlines for the filing of the certified index to the record, and any procedural or dispositive motions set forth in the 12/7/21 order in 20-1441, et al. remains in effect. [20-1441, 20-1445, 20-1484, 21-1043] [Entered: 02/02/2021 10:53 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [21-1043] [Entered: 02/02/2021 08:00 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1883191] of a decision by federal agency filed by Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Food Safety, National Family Farm Coalition and Pesticide Action Network North America [Service Date: 12/21/2020 ] Case transferred from: USCA 9th Circuit as Case No. 20-73750. Disclosure Statement: Attached. [21-1043] [Entered: 02/02/2021 08:05 AM] |
| MOTION [1883192] for leave to intervene [Disclosure Listing: Attached] filed by Bayer CropScience LP [Service Date: 01/19/2021 ] [21-1043] [Entered: 02/02/2021 08:10 AM] |
| MOTION [1883193] for leave to intervene [Disclosure Listing: Attached] filed by BASF Corporation [Service Date: 01/19/2021 ] [21-1043] [Entered: 02/02/2021 08:15 AM] |
| MOTION [1883201] for leave to intervene [Disclosure Listing: Attached] filed by Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC [Service Date: 01/19/2021 ] [21-1043] [Entered: 02/02/2021 08:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
