Center for Biological Div v. EPA, et al
| Center for Biological Diversity |
| Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency |
| 21-1073 |
| February 25, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1887360] filed upon consideration of the courts order filed February 25, 2021, consolidating case No. 21-1073 with case Nos. 21-1028, et al. and directing the petitioner to file initial submissions, it is ORDERED, on the courts own motion, that the petitioner in case No. 21-1073 is relieved of filing the initial submissions. It is FURTHER ORDERED that case No. 21-1073 is hereby held in abeyance pursuant to the order filed in case Nos. 21-1028, et al. on February 22, 2021. [21-1028, 21-1060, 21-1073] [Entered: 02/26/2021 10:36 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1887219] filed consolidating cases 21-1073 (Consolidation started 02/25/2021) with 21-1028; directing party to file in 21-1073 initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 03/29/2021. PETITIONER statement of issues due 03/29/2021 [21-1028, 21-1060, 21-1073] [Entered: 02/25/2021 04:12 PM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1887214] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1887211-2 ] [21-1073] [Entered: 02/25/2021 03:35 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1887211] of a decision by federal agency filed by Center for Biological Diversity [Service Date: 02/25/2021 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [21-1073] [Entered: 02/25/2021 03:30 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [21-1073] [Entered: 02/25/2021 03:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
