Jennifer St. Croix v. DEA
| Jennifer L. St. Croix, M.D. |
| Drug Enforcement Administration |
| 21-1116 |
| May 5, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE [1898356] received. Fee Amount: $500.00 Receipt Number: USCADC002491. [21-1116] [Entered: 05/12/2021 01:13 PM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1897779] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7017 3040 0001 1261 2168] of order [ # 1897700-2 ], [ # 1897697-3 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 06/07/2021 from Jennifer L. St. Croix. [21-1116] [Entered: 05/07/2021 12:23 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1897887] filed by Anita J. Gay on behalf of Respondent DEA. [21-1116] (Gay, Anita) [Entered: 05/07/2021 07:30 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1897700] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 06/07/2021. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 06/07/2021. PETITIONER statement of issues due 06/07/2021. PETITIONER underlying decision due 06/07/2021. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 06/07/2021. PETITIONER procedural motions due 06/07/2021. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 06/21/2021; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 06/07/2021. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 06/07/2021. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 06/21/2021. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 06/21/2021. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [21-1116] [Entered: 05/07/2021 08:59 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1897697] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis PETITIONER motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court due 06/07/2021; directing party to file payment of docketing fee PETITIONER payment of docketing fee due 06/07/2021. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [21-1116] [Entered: 05/07/2021 08:49 AM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1897694] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1897692-2 ] [21-1116] [Entered: 05/07/2021 08:40 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1897692] of a decision by federal agency filed by Jennifer L. St. Croix, M.D. [Service Date: 05/05/2021 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Applicable to this Party. [21-1116] [Entered: 05/07/2021 08:38 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [21-1116] [Entered: 05/07/2021 08:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jennifer St. Croix v. DEA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jennifer L. St. Croix, M.D. | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer L. St. Croix M.D. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Drug Enforcement Administration | |
| Represented By: | Anita J. Gay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
