Waterkeepers Chesapeake, et al v. FERC
Petitioner: Waterkeepers Chesapeake, Lower Susquehanna Riverkeeper, ShoreRivers and Chesapeake Bay Foundation
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Case Number: 21-1186
Filed: September 10, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2021 CLERK'S ORDER [1913829] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 10/13/2021. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 10/13/2021. PETITIONER statement of issues due 10/13/2021. PETITIONER underlying decision due 10/13/2021. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 10/13/2021. PETITIONER procedural motions due 10/13/2021. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 10/28/2021; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 10/13/2021. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 10/13/2021. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 10/28/2021. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 10/28/2021 [21-1186] [Entered: 09/13/2021 01:29 PM]
September 13, 2021 CERTIFIED COPY [1913827] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1913825-2 ] [21-1186] [Entered: 09/13/2021 01:24 PM]
September 10, 2021 PETITION FOR REVIEW [1913825] of a decision by federal agency filed by Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Lower Susquehanna Riverkeeper, ShoreRivers and Waterkeepers Chesapeake [Service Date: 09/10/2021 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [21-1186] [Entered: 09/13/2021 01:23 PM]
September 10, 2021 PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [21-1186] [Entered: 09/13/2021 01:21 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Waterkeepers Chesapeake, et al v. FERC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Waterkeepers Chesapeake
Represented By: James Samuel Pew
Represented By: Kathleen Lea Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lower Susquehanna Riverkeeper
Represented By: James Samuel Pew
Represented By: Kathleen Lea Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ShoreRivers
Represented By: James Samuel Pew
Represented By: Kathleen Lea Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Chesapeake Bay Foundation
Represented By: Paul W. Smail
Represented By: Brittany E. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?