USA v. David Winston, Jr.
David Emmanuel Winston, Jr., also known as David Emmanuel -016winston |
United States of America |
21-3001 |
January 27, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
LETTER [1882223] sent to warden sending Clerk order [ # 1882220-7 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 02/26/2021. [21-3001] [Entered: 01/27/2021 04:45 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1882220] filed directing party to file appointment of counsel motion: APPELLANT motion for appointment of counsel due 02/26/2021. Directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 02/26/2021. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 02/26/2021. APPELLANT statement of issues due 02/26/2021. APPELLANT underlying decision due 02/26/2021. APPELLANT transcript status report due 02/26/2021. APPELLANT procedural motions due 02/26/2021. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 03/15/2021. Directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 02/26/2021. APPELLEE procedural motions due 02/26/2021. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 03/15/2021. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [21-3001] [Entered: 01/27/2021 04:43 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1882199] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:95-cr-00007-RCL-1 filed by David Emmanuel Winston, Jr.. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-3001. [21-3001] [Entered: 01/27/2021 04:12 PM] |
CRIMINAL CASE docketed. [21-3001] [Entered: 01/27/2021 04:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.