USA v. Kenneth Benbow
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Kenneth Benbow, also known as BBD, also known as Fat Boy, also known as Stink
Case Number: 21-3085
Filed: December 1, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2022 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1932430] to motion [ # 1927680-2 ], motion [ # 1925251-2 ], motion [ # 1925387-2 ] filed by USA [Service Date: 01/26/2022 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 4,955 words. [21-3085] (Lenerz, Daniel) [Entered: 01/26/2022 03:42 PM]
January 13, 2022 UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1930480] submitted by Kenneth Benbow [Service Date: 01/13/2022 ] [21-3085] (Miller, Marvin) [Entered: 01/13/2022 01:32 PM]
December 24, 2021 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH TYPE-VOLUME LIMITS [1928124] for motion certificate of appealability [ # 1927680-2 ] filed by Kenneth Benbow. [21-3085] (Miller, Marvin) [Entered: 12/24/2021 11:35 AM]
December 21, 2021 STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1927652] filed by Kenneth Benbow [Service Date: 12/21/2021 ] [21-3085] (Miller, Marvin) [Entered: 12/21/2021 04:00 PM]
December 21, 2021 DOCKETING STATEMENT [1927650] filed by Kenneth Benbow [Service Date: 12/21/2021 ] [21-3085] (Miller, Marvin) [Entered: 12/21/2021 03:54 PM]
December 21, 2021 TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1927653] filed by Kenneth Benbow [Service Date: 12/21/2021 ]. Status of Transcripts: transcripts needed for the appeal have been ordered, but not all transcripts have been received. Next APPELLANT transcript status report due 01/20/2022. [21-3085] (Miller, Marvin) [Entered: 12/21/2021 04:02 PM]
December 21, 2021 MOTION [1927680] for certificate of appealability filed by Kenneth Benbow (Service Date: 12/21/2021 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: This document contains 75 words.. [21-3085] (Miller, Marvin) [Entered: 12/21/2021 04:39 PM]
December 21, 2021 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1927648] filed by Kenneth Benbow [Service Date: 12/21/2021 ] [21-3085] (Miller, Marvin) [Entered: 12/21/2021 03:52 PM]
December 21, 2021 UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1927655] submitted by Kenneth Benbow [Service Date: 12/21/2021 ] [21-3085] (Miller, Marvin) [Entered: 12/21/2021 04:03 PM]
December 10, 2021 CLERK'S ORDER [1926158] filed granting motion to extend time [ # 1926068-2 ]; directing response to motion certificate of appealability [ # 1925387-2 ] due on 01/28/2022 [21-3085] [Entered: 12/10/2021 06:56 AM]
December 9, 2021 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1926067] filed by USA [Service Date: 12/09/2021 ] [21-3085] (Lenerz, Daniel) [Entered: 12/09/2021 11:39 AM]
December 9, 2021 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1926066] filed by Daniel J. Lenerz on behalf of Appellee USA. [21-3085] (Lenerz, Daniel) [Entered: 12/09/2021 11:38 AM]
December 9, 2021 UNOPPOSED MOTION [1926068] to extend time to file response to 01/28/2022 filed by USA [Service Date: 12/09/2021 ] Length Certification: 156 words. [21-3085] (Lenerz, Daniel) [Entered: 12/09/2021 11:41 AM]
December 3, 2021 MOTION [1925251] for certificate of appealability filed by Kenneth Benbow (Service Date: 12/03/2021 by CM/ECF NDA, Email) Length Certification: 3958 Words. [21-3085] (Miller, Marvin) [Entered: 12/03/2021 10:35 AM]
December 3, 2021 CORRECTED MOTION [1925387] for certificate of appealability filed by Kenneth Benbow (Service Date: 12/03/2021 by CM/ECF NDA, Email) Length Certification: 3,977 Words. [21-3085] (Miller, Marvin) [Entered: 12/03/2021 04:44 PM]
December 1, 2021 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1924905] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:10-cr-00051-PLF-2 filed by Kenneth Benbow. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-3085. [21-3085] [Entered: 12/01/2021 03:14 PM]
December 1, 2021 CLERK'S ORDER [1924909] filed directing the parties to file initial submissions: APPELLANT motion for appointment of counsel, if any, due 01/03/2022; APPELLANT docketing statement due 01/03/2022; APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 01/03/2022; APPELLANT statement of issues due 01/03/2022; APPELLANT underlying decision due 01/03/2022; APPELLANT transcript status report due 01/03/2022; APPELLANT procedural motions due 01/03/2022; APPELLANT dispositive motions due 01/18/2022; APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 01/03/2022; APPELLEE procedural motions due 01/03/2022; APPELLEE dispositive motions due 01/18/2022. [21-3085] [Entered: 12/01/2021 03:18 PM]
December 1, 2021 28 U.S.C. 2255 CASE docketed. [COA Status: COA denied]. [21-3085] [Entered: 12/01/2021 03:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Kenneth Benbow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Chrisellen Rebecca Kolb
Represented By: USAO Appellate Counsel
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Lenerz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Kenneth Benbow, also known as BBD, also known as Fat Boy, also known as Stink
Represented By: Marvin D. Miller
Represented By: Marvin David Miller Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?