Christopher Ellington v. Library of Congress, et al
Library of Congress, United States of America and Section Hiring Staff, EEO Advocate, NAME UNKNOWN |
Christopher M. Ellington |
21-5032 |
February 8, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1891779] submitted by Library of Congress and USA [Service Date: 03/25/2021 ] [21-5032] (Cirino, Paul) [Entered: 03/25/2021 04:55 PM] |
MOTION [1891776] for summary affirmance (Response to Motion served by mail due on 04/05/2021) filed by Library of Congress and USA (Service Date: 03/25/2021 by CM/ECF NDA, Email, US Mail) Length Certification: 3,196 words. [21-5032] (Cirino, Paul) [Entered: 03/25/2021 04:50 PM] |
NOTICE [1890213] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is granted [Case Number 21-5032: IFP] [21-5032] [Entered: 03/17/2021 09:48 AM] |
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1889698] received from Chris Ellington [signed for on 02/24/2021] for order [1884256-2] sent to Appellant Christopher M. Ellington [21-5032] [Entered: 03/12/2021 04:16 PM] |
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1888810] filed by Library of Congress, Section Hiring Staff, EEO Advocate and USA [Service Date: 03/08/2021 ] [21-5032] (Cirino, Paul) [Entered: 03/08/2021 01:54 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1888809] filed by Paul Cirino and co-counsel R. Craig Lawrence on behalf of Appellees Library of Congress, Section Hiring Staff, EEO Advocate and USA. [21-5032] (Cirino, Paul) [Entered: 03/08/2021 01:53 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1884171] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-00592-BAH filed by Christopher M. Ellington. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-5032. [21-5032] [Entered: 02/08/2021 12:37 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1884192] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 03/10/2021, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [21-5032] [Entered: 02/08/2021 01:18 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1884202] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 03/10/2021. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 03/10/2021. APPELLANT statement of issues due 03/10/2021. APPELLANT underlying decision due 03/10/2021. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 03/10/2021. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 03/10/2021. APPELLANT transcript status report due 03/10/2021. APPELLANT procedural motions due 03/10/2021. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 03/25/2021; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 03/10/2021. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 03/10/2021. APPELLEE procedural motions due 03/10/2021. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 03/25/2021, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [21-5032] [Entered: 02/08/2021 01:40 PM] |
CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1884256] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7017 3040 0001 1261 1369] of order [ # 1884192-5 ], [ # 1884202-6 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 03/10/2021 from Christopher M. Ellington. [21-5032] [Entered: 02/08/2021 03:57 PM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [21-5032] [Entered: 02/08/2021 12:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.