Alex Martinez v. USA, et al
Defendant / Appellee: Embassy of Israel, United States of America, Department of Justice Canada and Emily Haber, Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alex Martinez
Case Number: 21-5044
Filed: February 23, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2021 SUPPLEMENT [1894754] to appellant's brief [ # 1893787-2 ] filed by Alex Martinez [Service Date: 04/14/2021 ] [21-5044] [Entered: 04/15/2021 02:07 PM]
April 6, 2021 APPELLANT BRIEF AND APPENDIX [1893787] filed by Alex Martinez [Service Date: 04/06/2021 ] Length of Brief: 2,354 words. [21-5044] [Entered: 04/09/2021 09:37 AM]
April 1, 2021 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT [1892918] received from illegible [signed for on 03/13/2021] for order [1886733-2] sent to Appellant Alex Martinez [21-5044] [Entered: 04/02/2021 02:28 PM]
February 23, 2021 INTERNATIONAL MAIL SENT [1886733] of order [ # 1886665-5 ]. Acknowledgment of Receipt due 03/25/2021 from Alex Martinez. [21-5044] [Entered: 02/23/2021 01:59 PM]
February 23, 2021 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1886662] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cv-00172-UNA filed by Alex Martinez. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-5044. [21-5044] [Entered: 02/23/2021 10:40 AM]
February 23, 2021 CLERK'S ORDER [1886665] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 04/14/2021. APPENDIX due 04/14/2021. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send two copies of this order to appellant by air mail and to request appellant to return one copy of the order with a certification that it has been received. [21-5044] [Entered: 02/23/2021 10:47 AM]
February 23, 2021 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [21-5044] [Entered: 02/23/2021 10:38 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Alex Martinez v. USA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Embassy of Israel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Department of Justice Canada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Emily Haber, Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Alex Martinez
Represented By: Alex Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?