Craig Mackenzie v. Marcia Fudge, et al
Defendant / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Marcia L. Fudge, HUD Secretary, United States Department of Justice and United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
Plaintiff / Appellant: Craig Steven Mackenzie
Case Number: 21-5069
Filed: March 23, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2021 REPLY [1899410] filed by Mr. Craig Steven Mackenzie to response [ # 1898591-2 ], [ # 1898591-3 ] [Service Date: 05/19/2021 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 2,597 words. [21-5069] (Mackenzie, Craig) [Entered: 05/19/2021 03:32 PM]
May 13, 2021 REPLY [1898591] filed by DOJ, Marcia L. Fudge, Merrick B. Garland and HUD to response and RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION filed to Cross Motion [ # 1897652-2 ] [Service Date: 05/13/2021 by US Mail] Length Certification: 1,936 words. [21-5069] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 05/13/2021 08:40 PM]
May 6, 2021 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1897652] to motion for summary affirmance [ # 1897419-2 ] combined with a MOTION for summary reversal filed by Mr. Craig Steven Mackenzie [Service Date: 05/06/2021 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 6,799 words; 571 Lines. [21-5069] (Mackenzie, Craig) [Entered: 05/06/2021 04:13 PM]
May 5, 2021 MOTION [1897419] for summary affirmance (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/20/2021) filed by DOJ, Marcia L. Fudge, Merrick B. Garland and HUD (Service Date: 05/05/2021 by US Mail) Length Certification: 2,726 words. [21-5069] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 05/05/2021 03:01 PM]
April 14, 2021 CLERK'S ORDER [1894520] filed granting motion to permit pro se electronic filing [ # 1892379-2 ] [21-5069] [Entered: 04/14/2021 11:49 AM]
April 1, 2021 OBJECTIONS [1892977] to certificate [ # 1891393-2 ] filed by Craig Steven Mackenzie [Service Date: 04/01/2021 by CM/ECF NDA] [21-5069] [Entered: 04/02/2021 04:27 PM]
March 30, 2021 UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1892378] submitted by Craig Steven Mackenzie [Service Date: 03/29/2021] [21-5069] [Entered: 03/30/2021 05:02 PM]
March 30, 2021 MOTION [1892379] to permit pro se electronic filing status filed by Craig Steven Mackenzie (Service Date: 03/29/2021 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 2 pages. [21-5069] [Entered: 03/30/2021 05:03 PM]
March 30, 2021 MOTION [1892381] to appoint amicus curiae filed by Craig Steven Mackenzie (Service Date: 03/29/2021 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 2 pages. [21-5069] [Entered: 03/30/2021 05:05 PM]
March 30, 2021 TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1892377] filed by Craig Steven Mackenzie [Service Date: 03/29/2021]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [21-5069] [Entered: 03/30/2021 05:01 PM]
March 30, 2021 STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1892376] filed by Craig Steven Mackenzie [Service Date: 03/29/2021] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [21-5069] [Entered: 03/30/2021 05:00 PM]
March 30, 2021 DOCKETING STATEMENT [1892372] filed by Craig Steven Mackenzie [Service Date: 03/29/2021] [21-5069] [Entered: 03/30/2021 04:58 PM]
March 30, 2021 STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1892373] filed by Craig Steven Mackenzie [Service Date: 03/29/2021] [21-5069] [Entered: 03/30/2021 04:59 PM]
March 30, 2021 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1892371] filed by Craig Steven Mackenzie. [21-5069] [Entered: 03/30/2021 04:57 PM]
March 30, 2021 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1892374] filed by Craig Steven Mackenzie [Service Date: 03/29/2021] [21-5069] [Entered: 03/30/2021 04:59 PM]
March 24, 2021 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1891393] filed by DOJ, Marcia L. Fudge, Merrick B. Garland and HUD [Service Date: 03/24/2021 ] [21-5069] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 03/24/2021 11:11 AM]
March 24, 2021 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1891363] filed by Johnny Walker and co-counsel R. Craig Lawrence on behalf of Appellees DOJ, Marcia L. Fudge, Merrick B. Garland and HUD. [21-5069] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 03/24/2021 10:16 AM]
March 23, 2021 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1891182] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-00411-TNM filed by Craig Steven Mackenzie. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-5069. [21-5069] [Entered: 03/23/2021 10:58 AM]
March 23, 2021 CLERK'S ORDER [1891186] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 04/22/2021. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 04/22/2021. APPELLANT statement of issues due 04/22/2021. APPELLANT underlying decision due 04/22/2021. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 04/22/2021. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 04/22/2021. APPELLANT transcript status report due 04/22/2021. APPELLANT procedural motions due 04/22/2021. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 05/07/2021; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 04/22/2021. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 04/22/2021. APPELLEE procedural motions due 04/22/2021. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 05/07/2021. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [21-5069] [Entered: 03/23/2021 11:02 AM]
March 23, 2021 CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1891319] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7017 3040 0001 1261 3721] of order [ # 1891186-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 04/22/2021 from Craig Steven Mackenzie. [21-5069] [Entered: 03/23/2021 05:32 PM]
March 23, 2021 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [21-5069] [Entered: 03/23/2021 10:57 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Craig Mackenzie v. Marcia Fudge, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Represented By: Johnny Hillary Walker III
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Marcia L. Fudge, HUD Secretary
Represented By: Johnny Hillary Walker III
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States Department of Justice
Represented By: Johnny Hillary Walker III
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
Represented By: Johnny Hillary Walker III
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Craig Steven Mackenzie
Represented By: Craig Steven Mackenzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?