Gene Schaerr v. DOJ, et al
| Gene Clayton Schaerr |
| United States Department of Justice, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, National Security Agency, Central Intelligence Agency and United States Department of State |
| 21-5165 |
| July 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1909950] filed by Gene Clayton Schaerr [Service Date: 08/11/2021 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [21-5165] (Schaerr, Gene) [Entered: 08/11/2021 06:39 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1909949] filed by Gene C. Schaerr and co-counsel Scott D. Goodwin on behalf of Appellant Gene Clayton Schaerr. [21-5165] (Schaerr, Gene) [Entered: 08/11/2021 06:38 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1909951] filed by Gene Clayton Schaerr [Service Date: 08/11/2021 ] [21-5165] (Schaerr, Gene) [Entered: 08/11/2021 06:41 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1909952] filed by Gene Clayton Schaerr [Service Date: 08/11/2021 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [21-5165] (Schaerr, Gene) [Entered: 08/11/2021 06:43 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1909953] submitted by Gene Clayton Schaerr [Service Date: 08/11/2021 ] [21-5165] (Schaerr, Gene) [Entered: 08/11/2021 06:51 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1909948] filed by Gene Clayton Schaerr [Service Date: 08/11/2021 ] [21-5165] (Schaerr, Gene) [Entered: 08/11/2021 06:35 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1909947] filed by Gene Clayton Schaerr [Service Date: 08/11/2021 ] [21-5165] (Schaerr, Gene) [Entered: 08/11/2021 06:32 PM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1907985] received from illegible [signed for on 07/23/2021] for order [1906926-2] sent to Appellant Gene Clayton Schaerr [21-5165] [Entered: 07/28/2021 09:36 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1906909] filed by Thomas Pulham and co-counsel H. Thomas Byron on behalf of Appellees DOJ, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, National Security Agency, CIA and DOS. [21-5165] (Pulham, Thomas) [Entered: 07/19/2021 04:23 PM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1906926] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7017 3040 0001 1261 3929] of order [ # 1906704-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 08/18/2021 from Gene Clayton Schaerr. [21-5165] [Entered: 07/19/2021 05:37 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1906699] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:18-cv-00575-ABJ filed by Gene Clayton Schaerr. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-5165. [21-5165] [Entered: 07/16/2021 12:05 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1906704] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 08/16/2021. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 08/16/2021. APPELLANT statement of issues due 08/16/2021. APPELLANT underlying decision due 08/16/2021. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 08/16/2021. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 08/16/2021. APPELLANT transcript status report due 08/16/2021. APPELLANT procedural motions due 08/16/2021. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 08/30/2021; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 08/16/2021. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 08/16/2021. APPELLEE procedural motions due 08/16/2021. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 08/30/2021, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [21-5165] [Entered: 07/16/2021 12:09 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [21-5165] [Entered: 07/16/2021 12:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
