Annetta Nicholas v. United States Department of Treasury, et al
| Annetta H. Nicholas |
| United States Department of Treasury and District of Columbia Retirement Board |
| 21-5187 |
| August 27, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UNOPPOSED MOTION [1916718] to extend time to file motion to 12/02/2021 filed by United States Department of Treasury [Service Date: 10/04/2021 ] Length Certification: 248 Words. [21-5187] (Simon, Jeremy) [Entered: 10/04/2021 04:44 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1915807] filed by Annetta H. Nicholas [Service Date: 09/27/2021 ] [21-5187] (Fay, Raymond) [Entered: 09/27/2021 08:52 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1915806] filed by Annetta H. Nicholas [Service Date: 09/27/2021 ] [21-5187] (Fay, Raymond) [Entered: 09/27/2021 08:46 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1915808] filed by Annetta H. Nicholas [Service Date: 09/27/2021 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [21-5187]--[Edited 09/28/2021 by TAM] (Fay, Raymond) [Entered: 09/27/2021 08:57 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES AND UNDERLYING DECISION [1915809] filed by Annetta H. Nicholas [Service Date: 09/27/2021 ] [21-5187] (Fay, Raymond) [Entered: 09/27/2021 09:00 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1915810] filed by Annetta H. Nicholas [Service Date: 09/27/2021 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [21-5187] (Fay, Raymond) [Entered: 09/27/2021 09:04 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1915805] filed by Raymond C Fay on behalf of Appellant Annetta H. Nicholas. [21-5187] (Fay, Raymond) [Entered: 09/27/2021 08:42 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1915756] filed by United States Department of Treasury [Service Date: 09/27/2021 ] [21-5187] (Simon, Jeremy) [Entered: 09/27/2021 02:07 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1915703] filed by Lucy E. Pittman and co-counsel Carl J. Schifferle and Caroline S. Van Zile on behalf of Appellee District of Columbia Retirement Board. [21-5187] (Pittman, Lucy) [Entered: 09/27/2021 10:52 AM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1915705] filed by District of Columbia Retirement Board [Service Date: 09/27/2021 ] [21-5187] (Pittman, Lucy) [Entered: 09/27/2021 10:53 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1915755] filed by Jeremy S. Simon and co-counsel R. Craig Lawrence on behalf of Appellee United States Department of Treasury. [21-5187] (Simon, Jeremy) [Entered: 09/27/2021 02:06 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1911914] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-02088-JEB filed by Annetta H. Nicholas. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-5187. [21-5187] [Entered: 08/27/2021 03:50 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1911916] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 09/27/2021. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 09/27/2021. APPELLANT statement of issues due 09/27/2021. APPELLANT underlying decision due 09/27/2021. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 09/27/2021. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 09/27/2021. APPELLANT transcript status report due 09/27/2021. APPELLANT procedural motions due 09/27/2021. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 10/12/2021; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 09/27/2021. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 09/27/2021. APPELLEE procedural motions due 09/27/2021. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 10/12/2021 [21-5187] [Entered: 08/27/2021 03:51 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [21-5187] [Entered: 08/27/2021 03:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
