Howard Tyson, Sr. v. Louis DeJoy
Plaintiff / Appellant: Howard T. Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee: Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General
Case Number: 21-5191
Filed: September 9, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2021 REPLY [1920510] filed by Louis DeJoy to response [ # 1919520-2 ] [Service Date: 11/01/2021 by US Mail] Length Certification: 496 words. [21-5191] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 11/01/2021 05:05 PM]
October 22, 2021 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1919520] to motion for summary affirmance [ # 1918655-2 ] filed by Howard T. Tyson, Sr. [Service Date: 10/22/2021 by US Mail] Length Certification: 9 pages. [21-5191] [Entered: 10/25/2021 04:00 PM]
October 18, 2021 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1918655] to motion for summary reversal [ # 1917003-2 ] combined with a MOTION for summary affirmance filed by Louis DeJoy [Service Date: 10/18/2021 by US Mail] Length Certification: 2,590 words. [21-5191] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 10/18/2021 05:06 PM]
October 12, 2021 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1917760] filed by Johnny Walker and co-counsel R. Craig Lawrence on behalf of Appellee Louis DeJoy. [21-5191] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 10/12/2021 05:37 PM]
October 12, 2021 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1917761] filed by Louis DeJoy [Service Date: 10/12/2021 ] [21-5191] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 10/12/2021 05:38 PM]
October 5, 2021 MOTION [1917003] for summary reversal filed by Howard T. Tyson, Sr. (Service Date: 10/06/2021 by Clerk, CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 8 pages. [21-5191]--[Edited 10/12/2021 by AY] [Entered: 10/06/2021 12:21 PM]
October 5, 2021 SUPPLEMENT [1917004] to motion for summary reversal [ # 1917003-2 ] filed by Howard T. Tyson, Sr. [Service Date: 10/06/2021 ] [21-5191]--[Edited 10/12/2021 by AY] [Entered: 10/06/2021 12:23 PM]
October 5, 2021 STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1917005] filed by Howard T. Tyson, Sr. [Service Date: 10/06/2021 ] [21-5191] [Entered: 10/06/2021 12:25 PM]
October 5, 2021 UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1917002] submitted by Howard T. Tyson, Sr. [Service Date: 10/06/2021 ] [21-5191] [Entered: 10/06/2021 12:16 PM]
September 23, 2021 MOTION [1915735] to appoint counsel and to recuse filed by Howard T. Tyson, Sr. (Service Date: 09/23/2021 by CM/ECF NDA, Clerk) Length Certification: 2 pages. [21-5191] [Entered: 09/27/2021 12:25 PM]
September 23, 2021 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1915524] received from Illegible [signed for on 09/13/2021] for order [1913476-2] sent to Appellant Howard T. Tyson, Sr. [21-5191] [Entered: 09/24/2021 09:30 AM]
September 23, 2021 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1915729] filed by Howard T. Tyson, Sr.. [21-5191] [Entered: 09/27/2021 12:08 PM]
September 23, 2021 DOCKETING STATEMENT [1915727] filed by Howard T. Tyson, Sr. [Service Date: 09/23/2021 ] [21-5191] [Entered: 09/27/2021 12:06 PM]
September 23, 2021 TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1915731] filed by Howard T. Tyson, Sr. [Service Date: 09/23/2021 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [21-5191] [Entered: 09/27/2021 12:11 PM]
September 9, 2021 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1913458] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:16-cv-02087-KBJ filed by Howard T. Tyson, Sr.. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-5191. [21-5191] [Entered: 09/09/2021 01:56 PM]
September 9, 2021 CLERK'S ORDER [1913460] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 10/12/2021. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 10/12/2021. APPELLANT statement of issues due 10/12/2021. APPELLANT underlying decision due 10/12/2021. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 10/12/2021. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 10/12/2021. APPELLANT transcript status report due 10/12/2021. APPELLANT procedural motions due 10/12/2021. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 10/25/2021; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 10/12/2021. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 10/12/2021. APPELLEE procedural motions due 10/12/2021. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 10/25/2021; directing party to file appointment of counsel motion: APPELLANT motion for appointment of counsel due 10/12/2021. Failure to respond may result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [21-5191] [Entered: 09/09/2021 02:05 PM]
September 9, 2021 CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1913476] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7017 3040 0001 1261 3660] of order [ # 1913460-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 10/12/2021 from Howard T. Tyson Sr.. [21-5191] [Entered: 09/09/2021 03:02 PM]
September 9, 2021 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [21-5191] [Entered: 09/09/2021 01:54 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Howard Tyson, Sr. v. Louis DeJoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Howard T. Tyson, Sr.
Represented By: Howard T. Tyson Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Represented By: Johnny Hillary Walker III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?