Stephen Edwards v. Best Buy Co., Inc., et al
| Stephen S. Edwards |
| Best Buy Co., Inc., Delaware Corporations, Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc., Delaware Corporations, Best Buy Purchasing LLC, Delaware Corporations and United States of America |
| 21-5224 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| REPLY [1926139] in support of motion [ # 1925164-2 ] for other relief, styled as a response filed by Stephen S. Edwards in 20-5370 [Service Date: 12/09/2021 by Email] Length Certification: 3 pages. [20-5370, 21-5224 [Entered: 12/09/2021 05:09 PM] |
| RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1925862] to motion [ # 1925164-2 ] filed by Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and Best Buy Purchasing LLC in 20-5370, 21-5224 [Service Date: 12/08/2021 by CM/ECF NDA, Email, US Mail] Length Certification: Pursuant to FRAP 27(d)(1)-(2), this motion is typed in 14-point type with serifs, contains 533 words including headings, but excluding the title page and certificates, according to Microsoft Word.. [20-5370, 21-5224] (Boyce, Dawn) [Entered: 12/08/2021 12:21 PM] |
| CORRECTED MOTION [1925508] for summary affirmance filed by Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and Best Buy Purchasing LLC in 20-5370, 21-5224 (Service Date: 12/03/2021 by CM/ECF NDA, Email, US Mail) Length Certification: 1931 words [20-5370, 21-5224]--[Edited 12/09/2021 by SRJ] (Boyce, Dawn) [Entered: 12/06/2021 02:17 PM] |
| RESPONSE [1925796] to motion for summary affirmance [ # 1925338-2 ] filed by Stephen S. Edwards in 20-5370 [Service Date: 12/06/2021 by Email] Length Certification: 2 pages. [20-5370, 21-5224] [Entered: 12/08/2021 08:04 AM] |
| MOTION [1925338] for summary affirmance filed by Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and Best Buy Purchasing LLC in 20-5370, 21-5224 (Service Date: 12/03/2021 by CM/ECF NDA, US Mail) Length Certification: Pursuant to FRAP 27(d)(1)-(2), this motion is typed in 14-point type with serifs, contains 1931 words including headings, but excluding the title page and certificates, according to Microsoft Word.. [20-5370, 21-5224] (Boyce, Dawn) [Entered: 12/03/2021 02:58 PM] |
| MOTION [1925164] for other relief filed by Stephen S. Edwards in 20-5370 (Service Date: 11/30/2021 by Email) Length Certification: 6 pages. [20-5370, 21-5224] [Entered: 12/02/2021 03:46 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1923726] filed by Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and Best Buy Purchasing LLC in 20-5370 [Service Date: 11/23/2021 ] [20-5370, 21-5224] (Boyce, Dawn) [Entered: 11/23/2021 12:14 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1923724] filed by Ms. Dawn E. Boyce for Best Buy Purchasing LLC, Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and Best Buy Co., Inc. in 20-5370, 21-5224. [20-5370, 21-5224]--[MODIFIED EVENT--Edited 11/23/2021 by LMC] (Boyce, Dawn) [Entered: 11/23/2021 12:12 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1923094] filed by Kenneth Adebonojo on behalf of Appellee USA in 20-5370, 21-5224. [20-5370, 21-5224] (Lawrence, R.) [Entered: 11/18/2021 02:51 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1923092] filed by USA in 20-5370, 21-5224 [Service Date: 11/18/2021 ] [20-5370, 21-5224] (Lawrence, R.) [Entered: 11/18/2021 02:45 PM] |
| APPELLANT BRIEF [1922280] filed by Stephen S. Edwards in 20-5370 [Service Date: 11/15/2021 ] Length of Brief: 63 pages. [20-5370, 21-5224] [Entered: 11/15/2021 08:48 AM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED [1920747] marked "Return to sender. Not deliverable as addressed. Unable to forward.". Certified Mail [1918797-2] had been sent to Party Stephen S. Edwards in 20-5370. [20-5370, 21-5224] [Entered: 11/03/2021 09:33 AM] |
| FIRST CLASS MAIL RETURNED [1920607] marked "Return to sender. Not deliverable as addressed. Unable to forward." Mail [1918797-2] had been sent to Party Stephen S. Edwards in 20-5370, 21-5224. [20-5370, 21-5224] [Entered: 11/02/2021 11:27 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1918786] filed discharging order to show cause filed July 30, 2021 [ # 1915082-4 ] in 20-5370. Dismissing as moot motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 1918190-2 ] in 20-5370. Consolidating cases. Directing the parties to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 11/18/2021; APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 11/18/2021; APPELLANT statement of issues due 11/18/2021; APPELLANT underlying decision due 11/18/2021; APPELLANT procedural motions due 11/18/2021. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 12/03/2021; APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 11/18/2021; APPELLEE entry of appearance due 11/18/2021; APPELLEE procedural motions due 11/18/2021; APPELLEE dispositive motions due 12/03/2021. Deferring consideration of motion to recuse [ # 1900057-2 ] in 20-5370 pending further order of the Court. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [20-5370, 21-5224] [Entered: 10/19/2021 02:01 PM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1918797] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7017 3040 0001 1261 3578] of order [ # 1918786-7 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 11/18/2021 from Stephen S. Edwards. [20-5370, 21-5224] [Entered: 10/19/2021 02:27 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1918567] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-03316-EGS filed by Stephen S. Edwards. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-5224. [21-5224] [Entered: 10/18/2021 01:17 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [21-5224] [Entered: 10/18/2021 01:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
