Crowley Government Services, Inc. v. GSA, et al
Crowley Government Services, Inc. |
General Services Administration and Robin Carnahan, in her official capacity as Administrator of the General Services Administration |
21-5242 |
October 29, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
![]() |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S ORDER [1925261] filed scheduling oral argument on Tuesday, 02/15/2022. [21-5242] [Entered: 12/03/2021 11:12 AM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1925188] filed by Steven H. Hazel and co-counsel Mark B. Stern on behalf of Appellees Robin Carnahan and GSA. [21-5242] (Hazel, Steven) [Entered: 12/02/2021 05:04 PM] |
PER CURIAM ORDER [1924942] filed that the motion to expedite [ # 1922105-2 ] be granted in part and that the following briefing schedule will apply for the remainder of this appeal: Appellees Brief due January 3, 2022. Appellants Reply Brief due January 14, 2022. The Clerk is directed to calendar this case for oral argument on the first appropriate date following the completion of briefing. The parties will be informed later of the date of oral argument and the composition of the merits panel. Before Judges: Millett, Wilkins, and Jackson. [21-5242] [Entered: 12/01/2021 04:35 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1924092] filed by Stephanie R. Johnson, Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-counsel R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney on behalf of Appellees Robin Carnahan and GSA. [21-5242] (Johnson, Stephanie) [Entered: 11/26/2021 09:56 AM] |
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1924093] filed by Robin Carnahan and GSA [Service Date: 11/26/2021 ] [21-5242] (Johnson, Stephanie) [Entered: 11/26/2021 09:59 AM] |
REPLY [1923861] filed by Crowley Government Services, Inc. to response [ # 1923519-2 ] [Service Date: 11/23/2021 by CM/ECF NDA, Email] Length Certification: 525 Words. [21-5242] (Boland, James) [Entered: 11/23/2021 05:17 PM] |
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1923519] to motion [ # 1922105-2 ] filed by GSA and Robin Carnahan [Service Date: 11/22/2021 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: The text of this Appellees' Opposition to Appellant's Emergency Motion for Expedited Treatment was prepared using 14-point Times New Roman typeface and consists of 1,828 words, as calculated by counsel's word processor. /s/ Stephanie R. Johnson. [21-5242] (Johnson, Stephanie) [Entered: 11/22/2021 02:29 PM] |
CORRECTED APPELLANT BRIEF [1923280] filed by Crowley Government Services, Inc. [Service Date: 11/19/2021 ] Length of Brief: 12,779 words. [21-5242] (Boland, James) [Entered: 11/19/2021 03:55 PM] |
LETTER [1923289] regarding corrected brief filed by Crowley Government Services, Inc. [Service Date: 11/19/2021 by CM/ECF NDA, Email] Length Certification: 58 Words. [21-5242]--[Edited 11/22/2021 by AH--MODIFIED EVENT] (Boland, James) [Entered: 11/19/2021 04:13 PM] |
LETTER [1922926] sent to counsel concerning the use of uncommon acronyms and abbreviations in briefs. Nonconforming Briefs: [ # 1922898-2 ]. [21-5242] [Entered: 11/17/2021 04:07 PM] |
JOINT APPENDIX [1922902] filed by Crowley Government Services, Inc.. [Volumes: 1] [Service Date: 11/17/2021 ] [21-5242] (Boland, James) [Entered: 11/17/2021 02:45 PM] |
APPELLANT BRIEF [1922898] filed by Crowley Government Services, Inc. [Service Date: 11/17/2021 ] Length of Brief: 12,221 Words. [21-5242] (Boland, James) [Entered: 11/17/2021 02:40 PM] |
EMERGENCY MOTION [1922105] to expedite case filed by Crowley Government Services, Inc. (Service Date: 11/12/2021 by CM/ECF NDA, Email, US Mail) Length Certification: 3,127 words. [21-5242] (Boland, James) [Entered: 11/12/2021 01:48 PM] |
PER CURIAM ORDER [1922229] filed upon consideration of the emergency motion to expedite this appeal, it is ORDERED, on the courts own motion, that appellees file a response to the motion by 4:00 p.m. on November 22, 2021. Before Judges: Millett, Wilkins and Jackson. [21-5242] [Entered: 11/12/2021 08:04 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1921974] filed by James Y. Boland and co-counsel Nicholas M. DePalma, Kevin W. Weigand, Christopher G. Griesedieck, Joanna R. Steele on behalf of Appellant Crowley Government Services, Inc.. [21-5242] (Boland, James) [Entered: 11/11/2021 03:55 PM] |
DOCKETING STATEMENT [1921980] filed by Crowley Government Services, Inc. [Service Date: 11/11/2021 ] [21-5242] (Boland, James) [Entered: 11/11/2021 05:00 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1921959] filed by Crowley Government Services, Inc. [Service Date: 11/10/2021 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [21-5242] (Weigand, Kevin) [Entered: 11/10/2021 07:29 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1920373] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 12/01/2021. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 12/01/2021. APPELLANT statement of issues due 12/01/2021. APPELLANT underlying decision due 12/01/2021. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 12/01/2021. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 12/01/2021. APPELLANT transcript status report due 12/01/2021. APPELLANT procedural motions due 12/01/2021. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 12/16/2021; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 12/01/2021. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 12/01/2021. APPELLEE procedural motions due 12/01/2021. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 12/16/2021 [21-5242] [Entered: 11/01/2021 11:35 AM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1920370] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cv-02298-BAH filed by Crowley Government Services, Inc.. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-5242. [21-5242] [Entered: 11/01/2021 11:30 AM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [21-5242] [Entered: 11/01/2021 11:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.