Shushean Wong, et al v. Merrick Garland, et al
| Shushean Wong and David Lee Koplow |
| Merrick B. Garland, United States Department of Justice and Jacquetta, Mail room for attorney general |
| 21-5262 |
| November 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1930201] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 03/03/2022. APPENDIX due 03/03/2022. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [21-5248, 21-5262] [Entered: 01/12/2022 10:16 AM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1930260] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 8679 5268 for David Koplow, and 7021 0350 0001 8679 5251 for Shushean Wong] of order [ # 1930201-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 02/11/2022 from David Lee Koplow and Shushean Wong. [21-5248, 21-5262] [Entered: 01/12/2022 12:48 PM] |
| NOTICE [1929518] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court of denial of motions to vacate [21-5248, 21-5262] [Entered: 01/06/2022 04:30 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1923244] filed consolidating cases 21-5262 (Consolidation started 11/19/2021) with 21-5248 [21-5248, 21-5262] [Entered: 11/19/2021 01:00 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1923241] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-mc-00094-UNA filed by David Lee Koplow and Shushean Wong. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-5262. [21-5262] [Entered: 11/19/2021 12:59 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [21-5262] [Entered: 11/19/2021 12:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
