Larry Klayman v. Neomi Rao, et al
| Larry Elliott Klayman |
| Neomi Rao, Hon., Robert Leon Wilkins, Hon., Laurence H. Silberman, Hon., Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, Hon., Tanya S. Chutkan, Hon., Srikanth Srinivasan, Hon., Karen LeCraft Henderson, Hon., Judith W. Rogers, Hon., David S. Tatel, Hon., Patricia Ann Millett, Hon., Cornelia T.L. Pillard, Hon., Gregory George Katsas, Hon., Justin Reed Walker, Hon., Ketanji Brown Jackson, Hon., Harry T. Edwards, Hon., Douglas H. Ginsburg, Hon., David B. Sentelle, Hon. and A. Raymond Randolph, Hon. |
| 21-5269 |
| November 30, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1928379] filed granting motion to extend time [ # 1927879-2 ]; APPELLANT Brief now due 02/18/2022. APPENDIX now due 02/18/2022 [21-5269] [Entered: 12/28/2021 12:29 PM] |
| MOTION [1927879] to extend time to file brief to 02/18/2022, to transfer case filed by Larry Elliott Klayman (Service Date: 12/22/2021 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 292 words. [21-5269] (Klayman, Larry) [Entered: 12/22/2021 03:52 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1924648] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 01/19/2022. APPENDIX due 01/19/2022. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [21-5269] [Entered: 11/30/2021 03:10 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1924632] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cv-02473-CRC filed by Larry Elliott Klayman. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-5269. [21-5269] [Entered: 11/30/2021 02:42 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [21-5269] [Entered: 11/30/2021 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
