CSL Plasma Inc., et al v. United States Customs and Border Protection, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: CSL Plasma Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., Biomat USA, Inc., Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. and GCAM, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: United States Customs and Border Protection and Chris Magnus, Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Case Number: 21-5282
Filed: December 8, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 10, 2022 Summary CSL Plasma Inc. v. United States Customs and Border Protection

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2022 JOINT APPENDIX [1931099] filed by Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. [Volumes: 1] [Service Date: 01/18/2022 ] [21-5282] (Weiss, Baruch) [Entered: 01/18/2022 05:51 PM]
January 18, 2022 APPELLANT BRIEF [1931098] filed by Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. [Service Date: 01/18/2022 ] Length of Brief: 8,256 words. [21-5282] (Weiss, Baruch) [Entered: 01/18/2022 05:44 PM]
January 10, 2022 AMENDED CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1929877] filed by Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. [Service Date: 01/10/2022 ] [21-5282] (Weiss, Baruch) [Entered: 01/10/2022 03:00 PM]
January 7, 2022 STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1929718] filed by Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. [Service Date: 01/07/2022 ] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [21-5282] (Weiss, Baruch) [Entered: 01/07/2022 05:24 PM]
January 7, 2022 DOCKETING STATEMENT [1929717] filed by Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. [Service Date: 01/07/2022 ] [21-5282] (Weiss, Baruch) [Entered: 01/07/2022 05:23 PM]
January 7, 2022 STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1929719] filed by Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. [Service Date: 01/07/2022 ] [21-5282] (Weiss, Baruch) [Entered: 01/07/2022 05:26 PM]
January 7, 2022 UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1929721] submitted by Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. [Service Date: 01/07/2022 ] [21-5282] (Weiss, Baruch) [Entered: 01/07/2022 05:31 PM]
January 7, 2022 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1929716] filed by Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. [Service Date: 01/07/2022 ] [21-5282] (Weiss, Baruch) [Entered: 01/07/2022 05:21 PM]
January 7, 2022 TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1929720] filed by Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. [Service Date: 01/07/2022 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - All transcripts needed for the appeal have been completed and received. [21-5282] (Weiss, Baruch) [Entered: 01/07/2022 05:27 PM]
January 6, 2022 CORRECTED CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1929400] filed by Chris Magnus and United States Customs and Border Protection [Service Date: 01/06/2022 ] [21-5282] (Yelin, Lewis) [Entered: 01/06/2022 10:23 AM]
January 4, 2022 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1929146] filed by Chris Magnus and United States Customs and Border Protection [Service Date: 01/04/2022 ] [21-5282] (Yelin, Lewis) [Entered: 01/04/2022 02:49 PM]
December 28, 2021 CLERK'S ORDER [1928442] filed, upon consideration of appellants' unopposed motion for expedited briefing and argument [ # 1928285-2 ], [ # 1928285-3 ], [ # 1928285-4 ], it is ORDERED that the following briefing schedule will apply in this case: APPELLANTS' Brief due 01/18/2022. APPENDIX due 01/18/2022. APPELLEES' Brief due on 02/17/2022. APPELLANTS' Reply Brief due 03/01/2022. The Clerk is directed to calendar this case for oral argument on the first appropriate date following the completion of briefing. The parties will be informed later of the date of oral argument and the composition of the merits panel. [21-5282] [Entered: 12/28/2021 03:07 PM]
December 27, 2021 UNOPPOSED MOTION [1928285] to establish briefing schedule, to expedite case, to expedite oral argument filed by Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. Length Certification: 520 words. [21-5282] (Weiss, Baruch) [Entered: 12/27/2021 08:12 PM]
December 27, 2021 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1928284] filed by Baruch Weiss and co-counsel R. Stanton Jones and Stephen K. Wirth on behalf of Appellants Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc.. [21-5282] (Weiss, Baruch) [Entered: 12/27/2021 08:06 PM]
December 16, 2021 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1927039] filed by Lewis S. Yelin and co-counsel H. Thomas Byron III on behalf of Appellees United States Customs and Border Protection and Chris Magnus. [21-5282] (Yelin, Lewis) [Entered: 12/16/2021 01:56 PM]
December 8, 2021 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1925831] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cv-02360-TSC filed by Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 21-5282. [21-5282] [Entered: 12/08/2021 11:06 AM]
December 8, 2021 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL [1925833] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cv-02360-TSC filed by Biomat USA, Inc., CSL Behring L.L.C., CSL Plasma Inc., GCAM, Inc. and Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc. [21-5282] [Entered: 12/08/2021 11:08 AM]
December 8, 2021 CLERK'S ORDER [1925835] filed directing the parties to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 01/07/2022; APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 01/07/2022; APPELLANT statement of issues due 01/07/2022; APPELLANT underlying decision due 01/07/2022; APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 01/07/2022; APPELLANT entry of appearance due 01/07/2022; APPELLANT transcript status report due 01/07/2022; APPELLANT procedural motions due 01/07/2022; APPELLANT dispositive motions due 01/24/2022; APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 01/07/2022; APPELLEE entry of appearance due 01/07/2022; APPELLEE procedural motions due 01/07/2022; APPELLEE dispositive motions due 01/24/2022. [21-5282] [Entered: 12/08/2021 11:14 AM]
December 8, 2021 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [21-5282] [Entered: 12/08/2021 11:04 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: CSL Plasma Inc., et al v. United States Customs and Border Protection, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CSL Plasma Inc.
Represented By: Baruch Weiss Esquire
Represented By: R. Stanton Jones
Represented By: Stephen K. Wirth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CSL Behring L.L.C.
Represented By: Baruch Weiss Esquire
Represented By: R. Stanton Jones
Represented By: Stephen K. Wirth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Biomat USA, Inc.
Represented By: Baruch Weiss Esquire
Represented By: R. Stanton Jones
Represented By: Stephen K. Wirth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Talecris Plasma Resources, Inc.
Represented By: Baruch Weiss Esquire
Represented By: R. Stanton Jones
Represented By: Stephen K. Wirth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: GCAM, Inc.
Represented By: Baruch Weiss Esquire
Represented By: R. Stanton Jones
Represented By: Stephen K. Wirth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States Customs and Border Protection
Represented By: DOJ Appellate Counsel
Represented By: Lewis Yelin
Represented By: H. Thomas Byron III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Chris Magnus, Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Represented By: DOJ Appellate Counsel
Represented By: Lewis Yelin
Represented By: H. Thomas Byron III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?