In re: John Riely
| In re: John T. Riely |
| 21-8502 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1895860] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.70173040000112612434] of order [ # 1895849-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 05/24/2021 from John T. Riely. [21-8502] [Entered: 04/23/2021 04:18 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1895849] filed to show cause regarding suspending attorney. Response to Order due 05/24/2021. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order.; The Clerk is directed to send this order to respondent by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [21-8502] [Entered: 04/23/2021 03:48 PM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY OF OPINION received from Court of Appeals MD; Case Number: MD-COA-AG20; Date of Action: 11/25/2020; Type of Action: suspension [Document: 21-8502_COA MD John Riely.pdf] [21-8502] [Entered: 04/23/2021 03:44 PM] |
| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE CASE docketed. [21-8502] [Entered: 04/23/2021 03:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: John Riely | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| In re: In re: John T. Riely | |
| Represented By: | John T. Riely |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
