Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. STB, et al
| Kansas City Southern Railway Company |
| Surface Transportation Board and United States of America |
| 22-1069 |
| April 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1945271] filed by Carolyn J. Chachkin and co-counsel Anika Sanders Cooper on behalf of Respondent STB. [22-1069] (Chachkin, Carolyn) [Entered: 05/03/2022 10:46 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1945174] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 06/01/2022. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 06/01/2022. PETITIONER statement of issues due 06/01/2022. PETITIONER underlying decision due 06/01/2022. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 06/01/2022. PETITIONER procedural motions due 06/01/2022. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 06/16/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 06/01/2022. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 06/01/2022. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 06/16/2022. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 06/16/2022 [22-1069] [Entered: 05/02/2022 03:24 PM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1945119] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1945115-2 ] [22-1069] [Entered: 05/02/2022 12:23 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1945115] of a decision by federal agency filed by Kansas City Southern Railway Company [Service Date: 04/29/2022 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [22-1069] [Entered: 05/02/2022 12:21 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [22-1069] [Entered: 05/02/2022 12:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
