Robert Nelson v. NTSB, et al
Petitioner: Robert Garrett Nelson
Respondent: National Transportation Safety Board and Karl L. Schultz, Commandant, United States Coast Guard
Case Number: 22-1079
Filed: May 9, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2022 CLERK'S ORDER [1946568] filed directing party to file payment of docketing fee PETITIONER payment of docketing fee due 06/13/2022; directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis: PETITIONER motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court due 06/13/2022. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [22-1079] [Entered: 05/13/2022 09:59 AM]
May 13, 2022 CLERK'S ORDER [1946569] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 06/13/2022. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 06/13/2022. PETITIONER statement of issues due 06/13/2022. PETITIONER underlying decision due 06/13/2022. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 06/13/2022. PETITIONER procedural motions due 06/13/2022. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 06/27/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 06/13/2022. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 06/13/2022. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 06/27/2022. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 06/27/2022. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [22-1079] [Entered: 05/13/2022 10:03 AM]
May 13, 2022 CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1946602] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7020 2450 0000 9475 6157] of order [ # 1946569-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 06/13/2022 from Robert Garrett Nelson. [22-1079] [Entered: 05/13/2022 12:21 PM]
May 12, 2022 CERTIFIED COPY [1946515] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1946512-2 ] [22-1079] [Entered: 05/12/2022 03:23 PM]
May 9, 2022 PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [22-1079] [Entered: 05/12/2022 03:20 PM]
May 9, 2022 PETITION FOR REVIEW [1946512] of a decision by federal agency filed by Robert Garrett Nelson [Service Date: 05/12/2022 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Applicable to this Party. [22-1079] [Entered: 05/12/2022 03:21 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Nelson v. NTSB, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Garrett Nelson
Represented By: Robert Garrett Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: National Transportation Safety Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Karl L. Schultz, Commandant, United States Coast Guard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?