GMS Mine Repair v. MSHR, et al
| GMS Mine Repair |
| Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission and Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) |
| 22-1143 |
| June 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1953455] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 08/04/2022. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 08/04/2022. PETITIONER statement of issues due 08/04/2022. PETITIONER underlying decision due 08/04/2022. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 08/04/2022. PETITIONER procedural motions due 08/04/2022. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 08/19/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 08/04/2022. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 08/04/2022. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 08/19/2022. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 08/19/2022 [22-1143] [Entered: 07/05/2022 02:15 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1953221] filed by Emily Toler Scott on behalf of Respondents Secretary of Labor and MSHA. [22-1143] (Scott, Emily) [Entered: 07/01/2022 01:25 PM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1953175] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1953174-2 ] [22-1143] [Entered: 07/01/2022 11:19 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1953174] of a decision by federal agency filed by GMS Mine Repair [Service Date: 06/30/2022 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Attached. [22-1143] [Entered: 07/01/2022 11:17 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [22-1143] [Entered: 07/01/2022 11:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
