Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. United States Forest Service, et al
| Center for Biological Diversity, Living Rivers, Sierra Club and Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment |
| United States Forest Service and United States of America |
| 22-1237 |
| September 8, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1962949] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 10/12/2022. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 10/12/2022. PETITIONER statement of issues due 10/12/2022. PETITIONER underlying decision due 10/12/2022. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 10/12/2022. PETITIONER procedural motions due 10/12/2022. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 10/27/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 10/12/2022. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 10/12/2022. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 10/27/2022. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 10/27/2022 [22-1237] [Entered: 09/12/2022 08:56 AM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1962945] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1962943-2 ] [22-1237] [Entered: 09/12/2022 08:46 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1962943] of a decision by federal agency filed by Center for Biological Diversity, Living Rivers, Sierra Club and Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment [Service Date: 09/08/2022 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [22-1237] [Entered: 09/12/2022 08:45 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [22-1237] [Entered: 09/12/2022 08:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
