International Dark-Sky Association, Inc. v. FCC
| International Dark-Sky Association, Inc. |
| Federal Communications Commission |
| 22-1337 |
| December 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 International Dark-Sky Association, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1980196] filed consolidating cases 23-1001 (Consolidation started 01/05/2023) with 22-1337; directing party to file in 23-1001 initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 02/06/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 02/06/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 02/06/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 02/06/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 02/06/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 02/06/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 02/21/2023 [22-1337, 23-1001] [Entered: 01/05/2023 09:51 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1980236] filed by James M. Carr on behalf of Appellee FCC in 22-1337, 23-1001. [22-1337, 23-1001] (Carr, James) [Entered: 01/05/2023 11:33 AM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1979558] of Notice of Appeal to appellee [ # 1979555-2 ] [22-1337] [Entered: 12/30/2022 10:01 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1979564] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 01/30/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 01/30/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 01/30/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 01/30/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 01/30/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 01/30/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 02/13/2023; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE entry of appearance due 01/30/2023. APPELLEE procedural motions due 01/30/2023. APPELLEE certified index to record due 02/13/2023. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 02/13/2023 [22-1337] [Entered: 12/30/2022 10:09 AM] |
| STATEMENT [1979575] with Disclosure Listing filed by International Dark-Sky Association, Inc. [Service Date: 12/30/2022 ] [22-1337] (Mudd, Charles) [Entered: 12/30/2022 10:42 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1979618] filed by Rachel Proctor May and co-counsel Jacob M. Lewis on behalf of Appellee FCC. [22-1337] (May, Rachel) [Entered: 12/30/2022 12:44 PM] |
| AGENCY NOTICE OF APPEAL CASE docketed. [22-1337] [Entered: 12/30/2022 09:55 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1979555] of a decision by federal agency filed by International Dark-Sky Association, Inc. [Service Date: 12/29/2022 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Attached. [22-1337] [Entered: 12/30/2022 09:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: International Dark-Sky Association, Inc. v. FCC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: International Dark-Sky Association, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Charles Lee Mudd Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: Federal Communications Commission | |
| Represented By: | James M. Carr Esquire |
| Represented By: | Rachel Proctor May |
| Represented By: | Jacob M. Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
