USA v. James King
United States of America |
James Edwin King |
22-3019 |
March 31, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION [1947896] to extend time to file initial submissions until motion to appoint counsel is resolved styled as letter filed by James Edwin King (Service Date: 05/24/2022 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 1 page. [22-3019] [Entered: 05/24/2022 06:21 PM] |
MOTION [1946748] to appoint counsel filed by James Edwin King (Service Date: 05/16/2022 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 2 pages. [22-3019] [Entered: 05/16/2022 12:56 PM] |
LETTER [1944054] sent to warden sending Clerk order initial submissions for appellant/petitioner [ # 1944051-4 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 05/23/2022. [22-3019] [Entered: 04/22/2022 02:26 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1944051] filed removing case from abeyance; directing party to file appointment of counsel motion: APPELLANT motion for appointment of counsel due 05/23/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 05/23/2022. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 05/23/2022. APPELLANT statement of issues due 05/23/2022. APPELLANT underlying decision due 05/23/2022. APPELLANT transcript status report due 05/23/2022. APPELLANT procedural motions due 05/23/2022. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 06/06/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 05/23/2022. APPELLEE procedural motions due 05/23/2022. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 06/06/2022. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [22-3019] [Entered: 04/22/2022 02:18 PM] |
NOTICE [1943841] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court for certificate of appealability [COA Status: COA denied] [22-3019] [Entered: 04/21/2022 11:33 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1941665] filed holding case in abeyance. Case 22-3019 held in abeyance pending COA decision in 1:18cr318-JDB from U.S. District Court; The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the district court. [22-3019] [Entered: 04/01/2022 05:31 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1941662] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:18-cr-00318-JDB-1 filed by James Edwin King. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-3019. [22-3019] [Entered: 04/01/2022 05:27 PM] |
28 U.S.C. 2255 CASE docketed. [COA Status: COA not requested] [22-3019] [Entered: 04/01/2022 05:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. James King | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Chrisellen Rebecca Kolb |
Represented By: | USAO Appellate Counsel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: James Edwin King | |
Represented By: | James Edwin King |
Represented By: | Warden (Fort Dix) |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.