Jonathan Burrs v. USA, et al

Jonathan Burrs v. USA, et al

Plaintiff / Appellant:	Jonathan Burrs
Defendant / Appellee:	United States of America, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Carrier Global Corporation, Walter Kidde Portable Equipment Inc., Catherine C. Eagles, individually and as a U.S. District Court Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina, Lawrence P. Auld, individually and as U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina, Terrence W. Boyle, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina, Office of the Clerk of the Court, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, John Doe, Manish Shah, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, David Dugan, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Southern District of Illinois, J. Harvie Wilkinson, III, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Circuit Court of Appeals, Dennis W. Shedd, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Circuit Court of Appeals, Albert Diaz, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Circuit Court of Appeals, Henry F. Floyd, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Circuit Court of Appeals, William B. Traxler, Jr., individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Circuit Court of Appeals and Roger Gregory, individually and as U.S. District Court Chief Judge for the Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Number:	22-5082
Filed:	March 29, 2022
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Injury

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
May 20, 2022	CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1947675] received from J Burrs for order [1941251-2] sent to Appellant Jonathan Burrs [22-5082] [Entered: 05/23/2022 03:55 PM]
April 27, 2022	CLERK'S ORDER [1944625] filed upon consideration of pro se appellants notice of withdrawal of this appeal, which was mistakenly filed in the district court, it is ORDERED that this case be dismissed. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith. [22-5082] [Entered: 04/27/2022 03:29 PM]
April 27, 2022	MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, U.S. District Court. [22-5082] [Entered: 04/27/2022 03:30 PM]
April 20, 2022	NOTICE [1943744] withdrawing appeal received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court to supplement record [22-5082] [Entered: 04/20/2022 01:41 PM]
March 30, 2022	CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1941251] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.70210350000186832116] of order [ # 1941133-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 04/29/2022 from Jonathan Burrs. [22-5082] [Entered: 03/30/2022 03:56 PM]
March 30, 2022	CLERK'S ORDER [1941133] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 04/29/2022. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 04/29/2022. APPELLANT statement of issues due 04/29/2022. APPELLANT underlying decision due 04/29/2022. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 04/29/2022. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 04/29/2022. APPELLANT transcript status report due 04/29/2022. APPELLANT procedural motions due 04/29/2022. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 05/16/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 04/29/2022. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 04/29/2022. APPELLEE procedural motions due 04/29/2022. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 05/16/2022, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [22-5082] [Entered: 03/30/2022 08:42 AM]
March 29, 2022	NOTICE OF APPEAL [1940972] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-00512-RDM filed by Jonathan Burrs. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5082. [22-5082] [Entered: 03/29/2022 10:10 AM]
March 29, 2022	CLERK'S ORDER [1940979] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 04/28/2022. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [22-5082] [Entered: 03/29/2022 10:28 AM]
March 29, 2022	CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1941095] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 8679 5305] of order [ # 1940979-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 04/28/2022 from Jonathan Burrs. [22-5082] [Entered: 03/29/2022 03:53 PM]
March 29, 2022	US CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-5082] [Entered: 03/29/2022 10:07 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jonathan Burrs v. USA, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Jonathan Burrs
Represented By:	Jonathan Burrs
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Represented By:	Christine Mary Costantino Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Carrier Global Corporation
Represented By:	Christine Mary Costantino Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Walter Kidde Portable Equipment Inc.
Represented By:	Christine Mary Costantino Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Catherine C. Eagles, individually and as a U.S. District Court Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Lawrence P. Auld, individually and as U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Terrence W. Boyle, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Office of the Clerk of the Court, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John Doe
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Manish Shah, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Northern District of Illinois
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: David Dugan, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Southern District of Illinois
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: J. Harvie Wilkinson, III, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Circuit Court of Appeals
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Dennis W. Shedd, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Circuit Court of Appeals
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Albert Diaz, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Circuit Court of Appeals
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Henry F. Floyd, individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Circuit Court of Appeals
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: William B. Traxler, Jr., individually and as U.S. District Court Judge for the Circuit Court of Appeals
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Roger Gregory, individually and as U.S. District Court Chief Judge for the Circuit Court of Appeals
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?