John Hughes, III v. Merrick Garland, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Hughes, III
Defendant / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Patricia K. Cushwa, Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission and Michael Carvajal, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Case Number: 22-5115
Filed: May 6, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2022 LETTER [1945724] sent to warden sending Clerk order [ # 1945723-5 ], sending Clerk order ifp motion or docket fee [ # 1945721-2 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 06/06/2022. [22-5115] [Entered: 05/06/2022 10:35 AM]
May 6, 2022 CLERK'S ORDER [1945723] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 07/05/2022. APPENDIX due 07/05/2022. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [22-5115] [Entered: 05/06/2022 10:34 AM]
May 6, 2022 CLERK'S ORDER [1945721] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 06/06/2022; directing party to file ifp prisoner submissions: APPELLANT prisoner trust account report due 06/06/2022. APPELLANT consent to collection form due 06/06/2022. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [22-5115] [Entered: 05/06/2022 10:27 AM]
May 6, 2022 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1945718] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-00212-UNA filed by John Hughes, III. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5115. [22-5115] [Entered: 05/06/2022 10:24 AM]
May 6, 2022 US PRISONER CASE docketed. [22-5115] [Entered: 05/06/2022 10:24 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Hughes, III v. Merrick Garland, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: John Hughes, III
Represented By: John Hughes III
Represented By: Warden (Petersburg Low)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Patricia K. Cushwa, Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Michael Carvajal, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?