In re: Eric Taylor
In re: Eric Emanuel Taylor |
22-5127 |
May 11, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE [1949123] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is granted [Case Number 22-5127: IFP] [22-5127] [Entered: 06/03/2022 08:30 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1949124] filed removing case from abeyance. [22-5127] [Entered: 06/03/2022 08:37 AM] |
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1949518] received from Eric Taylor [signed for on 06/01/2022] for order [1946376-2] sent to Appellant Eric Emanuel Taylor [22-5127] [Entered: 06/07/2022 08:56 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1947743] filed referring motion ifp in district court [ # 1947740-2 ] to the district court for consideration., holding case in abeyance. Case 22-5127 held in abeyance pending decision in 1:22cv744-TNM from U.S. District Court. The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order and the original motion to the district court. [22-5127] [Entered: 05/24/2022 09:15 AM] |
MOTION [1947740] leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court filed by Eric Emanuel Taylor [Service Date: 05/24/2022 ] Length Certification: 7 pages. [22-5127] [Entered: 05/24/2022 09:09 AM] |
APPENDIX [1947738] filed by Eric Emanuel Taylor [Volumes: 1] [Service Date: 05/24/2022 ] [22-5127] [Entered: 05/24/2022 09:04 AM] |
APPELLANT BRIEF [1947737] filed by Eric Emanuel Taylor [Service Date: 05/24/2022 ] Length of Brief: 13,000 words. [22-5127] [Entered: 05/24/2022 09:02 AM] |
DOCKETING STATEMENT [1947736] filed by Eric Emanuel Taylor [Service Date: 05/24/2022 ] [22-5127] [Entered: 05/24/2022 08:59 AM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1946367] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-00744-TNM filed by Eric Emanuel Taylor. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5127. [22-5127] [Entered: 05/11/2022 03:24 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1946370] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 06/10/2022, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [22-5127] [Entered: 05/11/2022 03:28 PM] |
CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1946376] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.70202450000094753316] of order [ # 1946372-5 ], [ # 1946370-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 06/10/2022 from Eric Emanuel Taylor. [22-5127] [Entered: 05/11/2022 03:41 PM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-5127] [Entered: 05/11/2022 03:23 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1946372] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 06/30/2022. APPENDIX due 06/30/2022, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [22-5127] [Entered: 05/11/2022 03:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Eric Taylor | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: In re: Eric Emanuel Taylor | |
Represented By: | Eric Emanuel Taylor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.