Timothy YoungIn re: Timothy Young
In re: Timothy Doyle Young |
22-5162 |
June 6, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
LETTER [1949707] sent to warden sending Clerk order [ # 1949706-5 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 07/08/2022. [22-5162] [Entered: 06/08/2022 09:59 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1949706] filed to show cause regarding payment of docketing fee. Response to Order due 07/08/2022. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to petitioner by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [22-5162] [Entered: 06/08/2022 09:49 AM] |
PETITION [1949703] for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Timothy Doyle Young [Service Date: 06/08/2022 by Clerk, CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 7 pages. [22-5162] [Entered: 06/08/2022 09:32 AM] |
US CIVIL ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [22-5162] [Entered: 06/08/2022 09:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Timothy YoungIn re: Timothy Young | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
In re: In re: Timothy Doyle Young | |
Represented By: | Warden (Florence USP Ad Max) |
Represented By: | Timothy Doyle Young |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.