Zachariah Brothers v. Nellis AFB
| Zachariah Brothers |
| Nellis AFB |
| 22-5168 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUPPLEMENT [1958140] to motion to expedite case [ # 1957373-2 ] filed by Zachariah Brothers [Service Date: 08/08/2022 ] [22-5168] [Entered: 08/08/2022 10:52 AM] |
| NOTICE [1958132] of filing filed by Zachariah Brothers [Service Date: 08/08/2022 ] [22-5168] [Entered: 08/08/2022 10:38 AM] |
| NOTICE [1957348] OF INTENT TO FILE CLASSIFIED INFORMATION filed by Zachariah Brothers [Service Date: 08/01/2022 ] [22-5168] [Entered: 08/01/2022 04:44 PM] |
| MOTION [1957373] for expedited status conference filed by Zachariah Brothers (Service Date: 08/01/2022 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 1 page. [22-5168] [Entered: 08/01/2022 05:12 PM] |
| MOTION [1953914] to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [Case Number 22-5168: IFP Pending USCA] filed by Zachariah Brothers (Service Date: 07/07/2022 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 7 pages. [22-5168] [Entered: 07/07/2022 03:41 PM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1951568] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 9948 0212] of order [ # 1951476-3 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 07/22/2022 from Zachariah Brothers. [22-5168] [Entered: 06/22/2022 05:01 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1951476] filed removing case from abeyance; directing party to file payment of docketing fee APPELLANT payment of docketing fee due 07/22/2022; directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis: APPELLANT motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court due 07/22/2022. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [22-5168] [Entered: 06/22/2022 11:28 AM] |
| NOTICE [1951468] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is denied [Case Number 22-5168: IFP Denied USDC] [22-5168] [Entered: 06/22/2022 11:14 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1950230] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-01282-RDM filed by Zachariah Brothers. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5168. [22-5168] [Entered: 06/10/2022 04:05 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1950233] filed holding case in abeyance. Case 22-5168 held in abeyance pending decision in 1:22cv1282-RDM from U.S. District Court. The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the district court. [22-5168] [Entered: 06/10/2022 04:08 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-5168] [Entered: 06/10/2022 04:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Zachariah Brothers v. Nellis AFB | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Zachariah Brothers | |
| Represented By: | Zachariah Brothers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Nellis AFB | |
| Represented By: | R. Craig Lawrence |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
