Kaboni Savage v. DOJ, et al
Kaboni Savage |
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States, J. Robert Bryden, II, in his official capacity as the Director, Office of Enforcement Operations and Jennifer A.H. Hodge, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Attorney General |
22-5240 |
September 19, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S ORDER [1973282] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 12/20/2022. APPELLEE Brief due on 01/19/2023. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 02/09/2023. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 02/16/2023. Final Briefs due 03/02/2023. [22-5240] [Entered: 11/10/2022 04:25 PM] |
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1969977] filed by J. Robert Bryden, II, DOJ, Merrick B. Garland and Jennifer A.H. Hodge [Service Date: 10/20/2022 ] [22-5240] (Lawrence, R.) [Entered: 10/20/2022 05:13 PM] |
STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1969701] filed by Kaboni Savage [Service Date: 10/19/2022 ] [22-5240] (Hicks, Joseph) [Entered: 10/19/2022 01:27 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1969702] filed by Kaboni Savage [Service Date: 10/19/2022 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [22-5240] (Hicks, Joseph) [Entered: 10/19/2022 01:31 PM] |
CORRECTED UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1969719] submitted by Kaboni Savage [Service Date: 10/19/2022 ] [22-5240]--[Edited 10/19/2022 by LMM] (Hicks, Joseph) [Entered: 10/19/2022 02:31 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1969700] filed by Joseph R. Hicks and co-counsel Seth A. Rosenthal, Christopher N. Moran on behalf of Appellant Kaboni Savage. [22-5240] (Hicks, Joseph) [Entered: 10/19/2022 01:26 PM] |
STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1969699] filed by Kaboni Savage [Service Date: 10/19/2022 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [22-5240] (Hicks, Joseph) [Entered: 10/19/2022 01:23 PM] |
UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1969694] submitted by Kaboni Savage [Service Date: 10/19/2022 ] [22-5240] (Hicks, Joseph) [Entered: 10/19/2022 01:19 PM] |
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1969695] filed by Kaboni Savage [Service Date: 10/19/2022 ] [22-5240] (Hicks, Joseph) [Entered: 10/19/2022 01:20 PM] |
DOCKETING STATEMENT [1969698] filed by Kaboni Savage [Service Date: 10/19/2022 ] [22-5240] (Hicks, Joseph) [Entered: 10/19/2022 01:21 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1964743] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cv-01057-CKK filed by Kaboni Savage. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5240. [22-5240] [Entered: 09/19/2022 10:15 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1964752] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 10/19/2022. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 10/19/2022. APPELLANT statement of issues due 10/19/2022. APPELLANT underlying decision due 10/19/2022. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 10/19/2022. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 10/19/2022. APPELLANT transcript status report due 10/19/2022. APPELLANT procedural motions due 10/19/2022. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 11/03/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 10/19/2022. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 10/19/2022. APPELLEE procedural motions due 10/19/2022. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 11/03/2022 [22-5240] [Entered: 09/19/2022 10:27 AM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-5240] [Entered: 09/19/2022 10:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Kaboni Savage v. DOJ, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Kaboni Savage | |
Represented By: | Seth A. Rosenthal |
Represented By: | Joseph Hicks |
Represented By: | Christopher N. Moran |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: United States Department of Justice | |
Represented By: | R. Craig Lawrence |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States | |
Represented By: | R. Craig Lawrence |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: J. Robert Bryden, II, in his official capacity as the Director, Office of Enforcement Operations | |
Represented By: | R. Craig Lawrence |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Jennifer A.H. Hodge, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Attorney General | |
Represented By: | R. Craig Lawrence |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.