Joshua Franklin v. United States of America, Inc., et al
Joshua D. Franklin, also known as Josh |
United States of America, Inc., Food & Drug Administration, State of Florida, Corizon Medical Corporation, Florida Department of Corrections, Unknown Officials of Codis Database, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, John Doe, I, Director of FDA, Ron DeSantis, Governor of State of Florida and Ricky D. Nixon, Secretary of FDOC |
22-5248 |
September 26, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE [1971226] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is granted [Case Number 22-5248: IFP] [22-5248] [Entered: 10/31/2022 10:17 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1971234] filed removing case from abeyance, setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 12/30/2022. APPENDIX due 12/30/2022. Failure to respond may result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [22-5248] [Entered: 10/31/2022 10:40 AM] |
LETTER [1971237] sent to warden sending Clerk order [ # 1971234-6 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 11/30/2022. [22-5248] [Entered: 10/31/2022 10:49 AM] |
RECEIPT [1970912] received from Joshua Franklin [signed for on 10/1052022] for documents [ # 1966151-2 ] sent to Appellant Joshua D. Franklin [22-5248] [Entered: 10/27/2022 04:27 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1969668] filed referring motion ifp in district court [ # 1969659-2 ] to the district court for consideration., holding case in abeyance. Case 22-5248 held in abeyance pending IFP decision in 1:22cv2203-UNA from U.S. District Court. The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order and the original motion to the district court. [22-5248] [Entered: 10/19/2022 11:02 AM] |
PRISONER TRUST ACCOUNT REPORT [1969663] filed by Joshua D. Franklin [22-5248] [Entered: 10/19/2022 10:56 AM] |
PRISONER CONSENT TO COLLECTION [1969662] filed by Joshua D. Franklin [22-5248] [Entered: 10/19/2022 10:55 AM] |
MOTION [1969659] leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court filed by Joshua D. Franklin [Service Date: 10/19/2022 ] Length Certification: 8 pages. [22-5248] [Entered: 10/19/2022 10:53 AM] |
MOTION [1969655] to appoint counsel and private investigator filed by Joshua D. Franklin [Service Date: 10/17/2022 ] Length Certification: 1 page. [22-5248] [Entered: 10/19/2022 10:45 AM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1966144] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-02203-UNA filed by Joshua D. Franklin. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5248. [22-5248] [Entered: 09/26/2022 03:50 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1966148] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 10/26/2022; directing party to file ifp prisoner submissions: APPELLANT prisoner trust account report due 10/26/2022. APPELLANT consent to collection form due 10/26/2022. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [22-5248] [Entered: 09/26/2022 03:53 PM] |
LETTER [1966151] sent to warden sending Clerk order [ # 1966148-6 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 10/26/2022. [22-5248] [Entered: 09/26/2022 03:58 PM] |
US PRISONER CASE docketed. [22-5248] [Entered: 09/26/2022 03:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.