Michael Langeman v. Merrick Garland, et al
| Michael W. Langeman |
| Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, Christopher A. Wray, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Paul Abate, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Federal Bureau of Investigation |
| 22-5264 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Labor Litigation |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1974378] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 12/28/2022. APPELLEE Brief due on 01/27/2023. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 02/17/2023. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 02/24/2023. Final Briefs due 03/10/2023. [22-5264] [Entered: 11/18/2022 04:36 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1971489] filed by Paul Abate, DOJ, FBI, Merrick B. Garland and Christopher A. Wray [Service Date: 11/01/2022 ] [22-5264] (Sturgill, Lowell) [Entered: 11/01/2022 09:40 AM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1970705] filed by Michael W. Langeman [Service Date: 10/26/2022 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [22-5264] (Berger, Lawrence) [Entered: 10/26/2022 02:42 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1970706] filed by Michael W. Langeman [Service Date: 10/26/2022 ] [22-5264] (Berger, Lawrence) [Entered: 10/26/2022 02:43 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1970707] submitted by Michael W. Langeman [22-5264] (Berger, Lawrence) [Entered: 10/26/2022 02:44 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1970704] filed by Lawrence Berger on behalf of Appellant Michael W. Langeman. [22-5264] (Berger, Lawrence) [Entered: 10/26/2022 02:40 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1970703] filed by Michael W. Langeman [Service Date: 10/26/2022 ] [22-5264] (Berger, Lawrence) [Entered: 10/26/2022 02:40 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1970701] filed by Michael W. Langeman [Service Date: 10/26/2022 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [22-5264] (Berger, Lawrence) [Entered: 10/26/2022 02:39 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1970700] filed by Michael W. Langeman [Service Date: 10/26/2022 ] [22-5264] (Berger, Lawrence) [Entered: 10/26/2022 02:37 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1970108] filed by Lowell V. Sturgill Jr. and co-counsel Joshua M. Salzman on behalf of Appellees Paul Abate, DOJ, FBI, Merrick B. Garland and Christopher A. Wray. [22-5264] (Sturgill, Lowell) [Entered: 10/21/2022 03:04 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1967204] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 11/02/2022. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 11/02/2022. APPELLANT statement of issues due 11/02/2022. APPELLANT underlying decision due 11/02/2022. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 11/02/2022. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 11/02/2022. APPELLANT transcript status report due 11/02/2022. APPELLANT procedural motions due 11/02/2022. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 11/17/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 11/02/2022. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 11/02/2022. APPELLEE procedural motions due 11/02/2022. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 11/17/2022 [22-5264] [Entered: 10/03/2022 02:34 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1967202] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cv-02888-RJL filed by Michael W. Langeman. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5264. [22-5264] [Entered: 10/03/2022 02:32 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-5264] [Entered: 10/03/2022 02:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
