Randeep Mann v. USA, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Randeep Singh Mann
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Office of Attorney General, Attorney General, Office of Inspector General, Inspector General, Office of Professional Responsibility, Director OPR, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Director EOUSA, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director FBI and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Internal Affairs - Director, BATFE
Case Number: 22-5286
Filed: November 2, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2022 CLERK'S ORDER [1979550] filed dismissing as moot motion to extend time [ # 1976633-2 ] [22-5286] [Entered: 12/30/2022 09:46 AM]
December 23, 2022 APPELLANT BRIEF [1979303] filed by Randeep Singh Mann [Service Date: 12/19/2022 ] Length of Brief: 25 pages. [22-5286] [Entered: 12/28/2022 10:56 AM]
December 23, 2022 APPENDIX [1979304] filed by Randeep Singh Mann [Volumes: 1] [Service Date: 12/19/2022 ] [22-5286] [Entered: 12/28/2022 11:00 AM]
December 7, 2022 RECEIPT [1976918] received from R Mann [signed for on 11/30/2022] for documents [ # 1971782-2 ] sent to Appellant Randeep Singh Mann [Per Warden:Unable to obtain ACKNOWLEDGMENT due to Institution Rules - Material Given to Mann, Randeep on 11/30/22 by counselor Ashworth] [22-5286] [Entered: 12/08/2022 03:29 PM]
December 5, 2022 MOTION [1976633] to extend time to comply with order [ # 1971777-2 ] filed by Randeep Singh Mann (Service Date: 12/07/2022 by CM/ECF NDA, Clerk) Length Certification: 3 pages. [22-5286] [Entered: 12/07/2022 08:50 AM]
December 1, 2022 LETTER [1975707] sent to warden sending Clerk order [ # 1975702-6 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 01/03/2023. [22-5286] [Entered: 12/01/2022 11:13 AM]
December 1, 2022 CLERK'S ORDER [1975702] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 01/03/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 01/03/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 01/03/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 01/03/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 01/03/2023. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 01/03/2023. APPELLANT transcript status report due 01/03/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 01/03/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 01/17/2023; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 01/03/2023. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 01/03/2023. APPELLEE procedural motions due 01/03/2023. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 01/17/2023. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [22-5286] [Entered: 12/01/2022 11:02 AM]
December 1, 2022 NOTICE [1975673] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court for payment of docketing fee [Case Number 22-5286: Fee Paid] [22-5286] [Entered: 12/01/2022 09:45 AM]
November 2, 2022 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1971772] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-01337-RC filed by Randeep Singh Mann. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5286. [22-5286] [Entered: 11/02/2022 12:21 PM]
November 2, 2022 CLERK'S ORDER [1971777] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 12/02/2022; directing party to file ifp prisoner submissions: APPELLANT prisoner trust account report due 12/02/2022. APPELLANT consent to collection form due 12/02/2022. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [22-5286] [Entered: 11/02/2022 12:42 PM]
November 2, 2022 LETTER [1971782] sent to warden sending Clerk order [ # 1971777-6 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 12/02/2022. [22-5286] [Entered: 11/02/2022 12:58 PM]
November 2, 2022 US PRISONER CASE docketed. [22-5286] [Entered: 11/02/2022 12:17 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Randeep Mann v. USA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Randeep Singh Mann
Represented By: Randeep Singh Mann
Represented By: Warden (Tucson)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States Department of Justice
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Office of Attorney General, Attorney General
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Office of Inspector General, Inspector General
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Office of Professional Responsibility, Director OPR
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Director EOUSA
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director FBI
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Internal Affairs - Director, BATFE
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?